Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33409005›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020

Deep Learning Model for Accurate Automatic Determination of Phakic Status in Pediatric and Adult Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Images.

Christopher Le, Mariana Baroni, Alfred Vinnett, Moran R Levin, Camilo Martinez, Mohamad Jaafar, William P Madigan, Janet L Alexander

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher LeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mariana BaroniDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alfred VinnettDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Moran R LevinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Camilo MartinezDepartment of Ophthalmology, Children's National Medical System, Washington, DC, USA.
Mohamad JaafarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Children's National Medical System, Washington, DC, USA.
William P MadiganDepartment of Ophthalmology, Children's National Medical System, Washington, DC, USA.
Janet L AlexanderDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USChildren's National · US

Funding

QAQC Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR003098 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2019 to 2023
$57.7M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR003099 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GEBO, KELLY A · 2019 to 2023
$7.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003099NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) is a noninvasive method for assessing anterior segment anatomy. Previous studies were prone to intergrader variability, lacked assessment of the lens-iris diaphragm, and excluded pediatric subjects. Lens status classification is an objective task applicable in pediatric and adult populations. We developed and validated a neural network to classify lens status from UBM images. Methods: Two hundred eighty-five UBM images were collected in the Pediatric Anterior Segment Imaging Innovation Study (PASIIS) from 80 eyes of 51 pediatric and adult subjects (median age = 4.6 years, range = 3 weeks to 90 years) with lens status phakic, aphakic, or pseudophakic ( Results: Our neural network trained across 60 epochs achieved recall 96.15%, precision 96.14%, F1-score 96.14%, false positive rate 3.74%, and area under the curve (AUC) 0.992. Feature saliency heatmaps consistently involved the lens. Algorithm performance was compared using 2 image sets, 1 from subjects of all ages, and the second from only subjects under age 10 years, with similar performance under both circumstances. Conclusions: A neural network trained on a relatively small UBM image set classified lens status with satisfactory recall and precision. Adult and pediatric image sets offered roughly equivalent performance. Future studies will explore automated UBM image classification for complex anterior segment pathology. Translational Relevance: Deep learning models can evaluate lens status from UBM images in adult and pediatric subjects using a limited image set.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLens, CrystallineAdultChildHumansInfant, NewbornIrisMicroscopy, AcousticNeural Networks, Computerdeep learninglens statusmachine learningtransfer learningultrasound biomicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID33409005
PMCPMC7779873
OpenAlexW3118096695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.