Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33408875›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2020

Thigh-worn accelerometry for measuring movement and posture across the 24-hour cycle: a scoping review and expert statement.

Matthew L Stevens, Nidhi Gupta, Elif Inan Eroglu, Patrick Joseph Crowley, Barbaros Eroglu, Adrian Bauman, Malcolm Granat, Leon Straker, Peter Palm, Sari Stenholm and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Validity and reliability of self-reported methods for assessment of 24-h movement behaviours: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Comparing national device-based physical activity surveillance systems: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Matthew L StevensMusculoskeletal Disorders and Physical Workload, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2621-4811
Nidhi GuptaMusculoskeletal Disorders and Physical Workload, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Elif Inan ErogluBoden Collaboration for Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise & Eating Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Patrick Joseph CrowleyMusculoskeletal Disorders and Physical Workload, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Barbaros ErogluSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Adrian BaumanSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Malcolm GranatSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Leon StrakerSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Peter PalmDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sari StenholmDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Mette AadahlCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Paul MorkDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Sebastien ChastinSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Vegar RangulHUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway.
Mark HamerInstitute Sport Exercise & Health, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Annemarie KosterDepartment of Social Medicine, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Andreas HoltermannMusculoskeletal Disorders and Physical Workload, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Emmanuel StamatakisSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
National Research Centre for the Working Environment · DKThe University of Sydney · AUNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOCurtin University · AUFrederiksberg Hospital · DKGlasgow Caledonian University · GBMaastricht University · NLUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Salford · GBUniversity of Turku · FIUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Prospective Physical Activity Sitting and Sleep consortium (ProPASS) is an international collaboration platform committed to harmonise thigh-worn accelerometry data. The aim of this paper is to (1) outline observational thigh-worn accelerometry studies and (2) summarise key strategic directions arising from the inaugural ProPASS meeting.

methods(1) We performed a systematic scoping review for observational studies of thigh-worn triaxial accelerometers in free-living adults (n≥100, 24 hours monitoring protocols). (2)Attendees of the inaugural ProPASS meeting were sent a survey focused on areas related to developing ProPASS: important terminology (Q1); accelerometry constructs (Q2); advantages and distinct contribution of the consortium (Q3); data pooling and harmonisation (Q4); data access and sharing (Q5 and Q6).

results(1) Eighty eligible articles were identified (22 primary studies; n~17 685). The accelerometers used most often were the ActivPAL3 and ActiGraph GT3X. The most commonly collected health outcomes were cardiometabolic and musculoskeletal. (2) None of the survey questions elicited the predefined 60% agreement. Survey responses recommended that ProPASS: use the term physical behaviour or movement behaviour rather than 'physical activity' for the data we are collecting (Q1); make only minor changes to ProPASS's accelerometry construct (Q2); prioritise developing standardised protocols/tools (Q4); facilitate flexible methods of data sharing and access (Q5 and Q6).

conclusionsThigh-worn accelerometry is an emerging method of capturing movement and posture across the 24 hours cycle. In 2020, the literature is limited to 22 primary studies from high-income western countries. This work identified ProPASS's strategic directions-indicating areas where ProPASS can most benefit the field of research: use of clear terminology, refinement of the measured construct, standardised protocols/tools and flexible data sharing.

Indexed as

accelerometerphysical activityreview

Identifiers

PMID33408875
PMCPMC7768971
OpenAlexW3114527818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.