Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33408775›Full record

ReviewTheranostics2021

The 2020 race towards SARS-CoV-2 specific vaccines.

Tomasz M Karpiński, Marcin Ożarowski, Agnieszka Seremak-Mrozikiewicz, Hubert Wolski, Donald Wlodkowic

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Theranostics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05081271 (COVID-19 Booster Vaccination in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05081271 early_phase1terminatednot on this map

COVID-19 Booster Vaccination in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorGriffin HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled10ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsHomologous booster, Heterologous booster
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. SARS-CoV-2 and Immunity: Natural Infection Compared with Vaccination.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. COVID-19 vaccine development: milestones, lessons and prospects.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tomasz M KarpińskiChair and Department of Medical Microbiology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Wieniawskiego 3, 61-712 Poznań, Poland.
Marcin OżarowskiDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Natural Fibres and Medicinal Plants, Poznań, Poland.
Agnieszka Seremak-MrozikiewiczDivision of Perinatology and Women's Disease, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Hubert WolskiDivision of Perinatology and Women's Disease, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Donald WlodkowicSchool of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global outbreak of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) highlighted a requirement for two pronged clinical interventions such as development of effective vaccines and acute therapeutic options for medium-to-severe stages of "coronavirus disease 2019" (COVID-19). Effective vaccines, if successfully developed, have been emphasized to become the most effective strategy in the global fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. Basic research advances in biotechnology and genetic engineering have already provided excellent progress and groundbreaking new discoveries in the field of the coronavirus biology and its epidemiology. In particular, for the vaccine development the advances in characterization of a capsid structure and identification of its antigens that can become targets for new vaccines. The development of the experimental vaccines requires a plethora of molecular techniques as well as strict compliance with safety procedures. The research and clinical data integrity, cross-validation of the results, and appropriated studies from the perspective of efficacy and potently side effects have recently become a hotly discussed topic. In this review, we present an update on latest advances and progress in an ongoing race to develop 52 different vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Our analysis is focused on registered clinical trials (current as of November 04, 2020) that fulfill the international safety and efficacy criteria in the vaccine development. The requirements as well as benefits and risks of diverse types of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are discussed including those containing whole-virus and live-attenuated vaccines, subunit vaccines, mRNA vaccines, DNA vaccines, live vector vaccines, and also plant-based vaccine formulation containing coronavirus-like particle (VLP). The challenges associated with the vaccine development as well as its distribution, safety and long-term effectiveness have also been highlighted and discussed.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesAntigens, ViralClinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19Drug ApprovalDrug DevelopmentHumansPandemicsPatient SafetySARS-CoV-2Time FactorsTreatment OutcomeViral Structural ProteinsAntigens, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesViral Structural Proteinsclinical trialscoronavirus disease 2019COVID-19SARS-CoV-2severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2vaccine

Identifiers

PMID33408775
PMCPMC7778607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.