Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33408743›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020

Machine Learning Models to Predict Primary Sites of Metastatic Cervical Carcinoma From Unknown Primary.

Di Lu, Jianjun Jiang, Xiguang Liu, He Wang, Siyang Feng, Xiaoshun Shi, Zhizhi Wang, Zhiming Chen, Xuebin Yan, Hua Wu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Di LuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianjun JiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiguang LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
He WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Siyang FengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoshun ShiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhizhi WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiming ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuebin YanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hua WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Kaican CaiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic cervical carcinoma from unknown primary (MCCUP) accounts for 1-4% of all head and neck tumors, and identifying the primary site in MCCUP is challenging. The most common histopathological type of MCCUP is squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and it remains difficult to identify the primary site pathologically. Therefore, it seems necessary and urgent to develop novel and effective methods to determine the primary site in MCCUP. In the present study, the RNA sequencing data of four types of SCC and Pan-Cancer from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) were obtained. And after data pre-processing, their differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, respectively. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis indicated that these significantly changed genes of four types of SCC share lots of similar molecular functions and histological features. Then three machine learning models, [Random Forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and neural network (NN)] which consisted of ten genes to distinguish these four types of SCC were developed. Among the three models with prediction tests, the RF model worked best in the external validation set, with an overall predictive accuracy of 88.2%, sensitivity of 88.71%, and specificity of 95.42%. The NN model is the second in efficacy, with an overall accuracy of 82.02%, sensitivity of 81.23%, and specificity of 93.04%. The SVM model is the last, with an overall accuracy of 76.69%, sensitivity of 74.81%, and specificity of 90.84%. The present analysis of similarities and differences among the four types of SCC, and novel models developments for distinguishing four types of SCC with informatics methods shed lights on precision MCCUP diagnosis in the future.

Indexed as

metastatic cervical carcinoma from unknown primaryneural networkpredictprimary sitesrandom forestsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID33408743
PMCPMC7779672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.