Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33408616›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2020

A Diversity of Intrinsic Timescales Underlie Neural Computations.

Sean E Cavanagh, Laurence T Hunt, Steven W Kennerley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Criticality and increased intrinsic neural timescales in stroke.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Parallel trade-offs in human cognition and neural networks: The dynamic interplay between in-context and in-weight learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cognitive processes are disentangled at cortex-wide scales.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Consistent Hierarchies of Single-Neuron Timescales in Mice, Macaques, and Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sean E CavanaghDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Laurence T HuntDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Steven W KennerleyDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 096689/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 098830/Z/12/ZWellcome Trust 208789/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 220296/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural processing occurs across a range of temporal scales. To facilitate this, the brain uses fast-changing representations reflecting momentary sensory input alongside more temporally extended representations, which integrate across both short and long temporal windows. The temporal flexibility of these representations allows animals to behave adaptively. Short temporal windows facilitate adaptive responding in dynamic environments, while longer temporal windows promote the gradual integration of information across time. In the cognitive and motor domains, the brain sets overarching goals to be achieved within a long temporal window, which must be broken down into sequences of actions and precise movement control processed across much shorter temporal windows. Previous human neuroimaging studies and large-scale artificial network models have ascribed different processing timescales to different cortical regions, linking this to each region's position in an anatomical hierarchy determined by patterns of inter-regional connectivity. However, even within cortical regions, there is variability in responses when studied with single-neuron electrophysiology. Here, we review a series of recent electrophysiology experiments that demonstrate the heterogeneity of temporal receptive fields at the level of single neurons within a cortical region. This heterogeneity appears functionally relevant for the computations that neurons perform during decision-making and working memory. We consider anatomical and biophysical mechanisms that may give rise to a heterogeneity of timescales, including recurrent connectivity, cortical layer distribution, and neurotransmitter receptor expression. Finally, we reflect on the computational relevance of each brain region possessing a heterogeneity of neuronal timescales. We argue that this architecture is of particular importance for sensory, motor, and cognitive computations.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCerebral CortexHumansMemory, Short-TermNerve NetNeural PathwaysNeuronsautocorrelationdecision-makingneuronal timescaletime constantworking memory

Identifiers

PMID33408616
PMCPMC7779632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.