Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33408613›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2020

Synaptic Loss in Alzheimer's Disease: Mechanistic Insights Provided by Two-Photon

Jaichandar Subramanian, Julie C Savage, Marie-Ève Tremblay

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nutrients · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Microglia in Brain Aging and Age-Related Diseases: Friends or Foes?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Redox modulation of the complement cascade contributes to synapse loss in Alzheimer's disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  19. C4d, a high-affinity LilrB2 ligand, is elevated in Alzheimer's disease and mediates synapse pruning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jaichandar SubramanianDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.
Julie C SavageAxe Neurosciences, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
Marie-Ève TremblayNeurology and Neurosurgery Department, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Université Laval · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

Synapse structural dynamics and memory loss in mouse models of Alzheimers diseaseR01AG064067 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI SUBRAMANIAN, JAICHANDAR · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG064067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synapse loss is the strongest correlate for cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. The mechanisms underlying synapse loss have been extensively investigated using mouse models expressing genes with human familial Alzheimer's disease mutations. In this review, we summarize how multiphoton

Indexed as

amyloid mouse modelsdendritic spinesin vivo imagingmicrogliatwo-photon

Identifiers

PMID33408613
PMCPMC7780885
OpenAlexW3112777140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.