Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33408469›Full record

ReviewClinical interventions in aging2020

Impact of Hearing Loss on Geriatric Assessment.

Christiane Völter, Lisa Götze, Stefan Dazert, Rainer Wirth, Jan Peter Thomas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical interventions in aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Joint Association of Combined Healthy Lifestyle Factors and Hearing Loss With Cognitive Impairment in China.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Evaluation of a non-auditory neurocognitive test battery in hearing-impaired according to age.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Do hearing loss interventions prevent dementia?Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christiane VölterDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Bochum 44787, Germany.
Lisa GötzeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Bochum 44787, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6265-1031
Stefan DazertDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Bochum 44787, Germany.
Rainer WirthDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital Herne, Herne 44625, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7265-0163
Jan Peter ThomasDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Bochum 44787, Germany.
St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum · DEUniversitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the aging society, the incidence of age-related hearing loss (ARHL) is strongly increasing. Hearing loss has a high impact on various aspects of life and may lead to social isolation, depression, loss of gain control, frailty and even mental decline. Comorbidity of cognitive and sensory impairment is not rare. This might have an impact on diagnostics and treatment in the geriatric setting.

objectiveThe aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of hearing impairment on geriatric assessment and cognitive testing routinely done in geriatrics. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search in Medline, including individual studies, meta-analyses, guidelines, Cochrane reviews, and other reviews from 1960 until August 2020.

resultsAwareness of sensory impairment is low among patients and health professionals working with elderly people. The evaluation of the hearing status is not always part of the geriatric assessment and not yet routinely done in psychiatric settings. However, neurocognitive testing as an important part can be strongly influenced by auditory deprivation. Misunderstanding of verbal instructions, cognitive changes, and delayed central processes may lead to a false diagnosis in up to 16% of subjects with hearing loss. To minimize this bias, several neurocognitive assessments were transformed into non-auditory versions recently, eg the most commonly used Hearing-Impaired Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HI-MoCA). However, most of them still lack normative data for elderly people with hearing loss.

conclusionHearing loss should be taken into consideration when performing geriatric assessment and cognitive testing in elderly subjects. Test batteries suitable for ARLH should be applied.

Indexed as

Mental Status and Dementia TestsAgedAged, 80 and overAgingCognitive DysfunctionDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHearing LossHumansMaleage-related hearing losscognitive screeningdementiageriatric assessment

Identifiers

PMID33408469
PMCPMC7779803
OpenAlexW3115023366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.