Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33408199›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Using sensor-fusion and machine-learning algorithms to assess acute pain in non-verbal infants: a study protocol.

Jean-Michel Roué, Iris Morag, Wassim M Haddad, Behnood Gholami, Kanwaljeet J S Anand

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03330496 (Using Machine-learning Algorithms to Assess Acute Pain in Nonverbal Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03330496 completednot on this map

Using Machine-learning Algorithms to Assess Acute Pain in Nonverbal Infants

TypeobservationalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2017 to 2022Enrolled43ConditionsPain, AcuteArmsPain Measurement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Multimodal physiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jean-Michel RouéNeonatal & Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Brest University Hospital, University of Western Brittany, Brest, France jean-michel.roue@chu-brest.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5734-7254
Iris MoragShamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Tel Aviv University Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Wassim M HaddadSchool of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Behnood GholamiAutonomous Healthcare, Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.
Kanwaljeet J S AnandDepartment of Pediatrics, Pain/Stress Neurobiology Laboratory, Maternal and Child Health Research Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Autonomous Healthcare · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USStanford University · USTel Aviv University · ILUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale · FR

Funding

Measuring Infant Pain Objectively using Sensor Fusion and Machine Learning AlgorithmsR41DA046983 · NIDA · AUTONOMOUS HEALTHCARE, INC. · PI GHOLAMI, BEHNOOD · 2018 to 2018
$225k
NIDA NIH HHS R41 DA046983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObjective pain assessment in non-verbal populations is clinically challenging due to their inability to express their pain via self-report. Repetitive exposures to acute or prolonged pain lead to clinical instability, with long-term behavioural and cognitive sequelae in newborn infants. Strong analgesics are also associated with medical complications, potential neurotoxicity and altered brain development. Pain scores performed by bedside nurses provide subjective, observer-dependent assessments rather than objective data for infant pain management; the required observations are labour intensive, difficult to perform by a nurse who is concurrently performing the procedure and increase the nursing workload. Multimodal pain assessment, using sensor-fusion and machine-learning algorithms, can provide a patient-centred, context-dependent, observer-independent and objective pain measure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In newborns undergoing painful procedures, we use facial electromyography to record facial muscle activity-related infant pain, ECG to examine heart rate (HR) changes and HR variability, electrodermal activity (skin conductance) to measure catecholamine-induced palmar sweating, changes in oxygen saturations and skin perfusion, and electroencephalography using active electrodes to assess brain activity in real time. This multimodal approach has the potential to improve the accuracy of pain assessment in non-verbal infants and may even allow continuous pain monitoring at the bedside. The feasibility of this approach will be evaluated in an observational prospective study of clinically required painful procedures in 60 preterm and term newborns, and infants aged 6 months or less. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Institutional Review Board of the Stanford University approved the protocol. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at scientific meetings, taught via webinars, podcasts and video tutorials, and listed on academic/scientific websites. Future studies will validate and refine this approach using the minimum number of sensors required to assess neonatal/infant pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03330496).

Indexed as

Acute PainHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMachine LearningPain ManagementPain MeasurementProspective Studiesneonatologypaediatricspain management

Identifiers

PMID33408199
PMCPMC7789448
OpenAlexW3120179124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.