ArticleBMJ open2021
Using sensor-fusion and machine-learning algorithms to assess acute pain in non-verbal infants: a study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03330496 (Using Machine-learning Algorithms to Assess Acute Pain in Nonverbal Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Using Machine-learning Algorithms to Assess Acute Pain in Nonverbal Infants
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pain assessment tools in adults with communication disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Beyond the face: advancing multimodal AI for neonatal pain assessment.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Pain assessment in non-verbal children with neurocognitive impairment: a review on current tools, challenges, and clinical perspectives.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Continuous wireless sensor monitoring with applied diagnostics: Clinical Sensor Pain Scale and Automated Sensor Pain Scale in the NICU.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- AI-Driven Multimodal Brain-State Decoding for Personalized Closed-Loop TENS: A Comprehensive Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Objective Detection of Newborn Infant Acute Procedural Pain Using EEG and Machine Learning Algorithms.Paediatric & neonatal pain · 2025Article
- Generalisation of EEG-Based Pain Biomarker Classification for Predicting Central Neuropathic Pain in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Multimodal automatic assessment of acute pain through facial videos and heart rate signals utilizing transformer-based architectures.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The past, current, and future of neonatal intensive care units with artificial intelligence: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- Multimodal physiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Assessment and Management of Pain in Preterm Infants: A Practice Update.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Triage through telemedicine in paediatric emergency care-Results of a concordance study.PloS one · 2022Article
- Automated facial recognition system using deep learning for pain assessment in adults with cerebral palsy.Digital healthArticle
- Face-based automatic pain assessment: challenges and perspectives in neonatal intensive care units.Jornal de pediatriaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionObjective pain assessment in non-verbal populations is clinically challenging due to their inability to express their pain via self-report. Repetitive exposures to acute or prolonged pain lead to clinical instability, with long-term behavioural and cognitive sequelae in newborn infants. Strong analgesics are also associated with medical complications, potential neurotoxicity and altered brain development. Pain scores performed by bedside nurses provide subjective, observer-dependent assessments rather than objective data for infant pain management; the required observations are labour intensive, difficult to perform by a nurse who is concurrently performing the procedure and increase the nursing workload. Multimodal pain assessment, using sensor-fusion and machine-learning algorithms, can provide a patient-centred, context-dependent, observer-independent and objective pain measure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In newborns undergoing painful procedures, we use facial electromyography to record facial muscle activity-related infant pain, ECG to examine heart rate (HR) changes and HR variability, electrodermal activity (skin conductance) to measure catecholamine-induced palmar sweating, changes in oxygen saturations and skin perfusion, and electroencephalography using active electrodes to assess brain activity in real time. This multimodal approach has the potential to improve the accuracy of pain assessment in non-verbal infants and may even allow continuous pain monitoring at the bedside. The feasibility of this approach will be evaluated in an observational prospective study of clinically required painful procedures in 60 preterm and term newborns, and infants aged 6 months or less. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Institutional Review Board of the Stanford University approved the protocol. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at scientific meetings, taught via webinars, podcasts and video tutorials, and listed on academic/scientific websites. Future studies will validate and refine this approach using the minimum number of sensors required to assess neonatal/infant pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03330496).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.