Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33408092›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021

Skin dendritic cells in melanoma are key for successful checkpoint blockade therapy.

Anastasia Prokopi, Christoph H Tripp, Bart Tummers, Florian Hornsteiner, Sarah Spoeck, Jeremy Chase Crawford, Derek R Clements, Mirjana Efremova, Katharina Hutter, Lydia Bellmann and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Tim-3-targeted vaccines overcome tumor immunosuppression and reduce cDC1 dependence to elicit potent anti-tumor immunity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Innate Immune Cells in Melanoma: Implications for Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Anastasia ProkopiDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology & Allergology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6009-9335
Christoph H TrippDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology & Allergology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5502-7241
Bart TummersDepartment of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Florian HornsteinerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology & Allergology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sarah SpoeckDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology & Allergology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Jeremy Chase CrawfordDepartment of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Derek R ClementsDepartment of Micobiology & Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Mirjana EfremovaInstitute of Bioinformatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Katharina HutterDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology & Allergology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Lydia BellmannDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology & Allergology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1891-5319
Giuseppe CappellanoDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology & Allergology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bruno L CadilhaCenter of Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPS-M) and Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine IV, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU Munich, Germany.
Sebastian KoboldCenter of Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPS-M) and Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine IV, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU Munich, Germany.
Louis BoonBioceros BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Daniela OrtnerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology & Allergology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Zlatko TrajanoskiInstitute of Bioinformatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Suzie ChenErnest Mario School of Pharmacy and Rutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Tanja D de GruijlDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Juliana IdoyagaDepartment of Micobiology & Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Douglas R GreenDepartment of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Patrizia StoitznerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology & Allergology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria patrizia.stoitzner@i-med.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-8488-6704
Innsbruck Medical University · ATSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich · DEStanford University · USAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLPolpharma Biologics (Netherlands) · NLRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Establishment, maintenance, and consequences of asymmetric cell division in T cellsR01AI123322 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI GREEN, DOUGLAS R. · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has shown impressive results in patients with melanoma, but still many do not benefit from this line of treatment. A lack of tumor-infiltrating T cells is a common reason for therapy failure but also a loss of intratumoral dendritic cells (DCs) has been described.

methodsWe used the transgenic tg(Grm1)EPv melanoma mouse strain that develops spontaneous, slow-growing tumors to perform immunological analysis during tumor progression. With flow cytometry, the frequencies of DCs and T cells at different tumor stages and the expression of the inhibitory molecules programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM-3) on T cells were analyzed. This was complemented with RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis to investigate the immune status of the tumors. To boost DC numbers and function, we administered Fms-related tyrosine 3 ligand (Flt3L) plus an adjuvant mix of polyI:C and anti-CD40. To enhance T cell function, we tested several checkpoint blockade antibodies. Immunological alterations were characterized in tumor and tumor-draining lymph nodes (LNs) by flow cytometry, CyTOF, microarray and RT-qPCR to understand how immune cells can control tumor growth. The specific role of migratory skin DCs was investigated by coculture of sorted DC subsets with melanoma-specific CD8+ T cells.

resultsOur study revealed that tumor progression is characterized by upregulation of checkpoint molecules and a gradual loss of the dermal conventional DC (cDC) 2 subset. Monotherapy with checkpoint blockade could not restore antitumor immunity, whereas boosting DC numbers and activation increased tumor immunogenicity. This was reflected by higher numbers of activated cDC1 and cDC2 as well as CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in treated tumors. At the same time, the DC boost approach reinforced migratory dermal DC subsets to prime gp100-specific CD8+ T cells in tumor-draining LNs that expressed PD-1/TIM-3 and produced interferon γ (IFNγ)/tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα). As a consequence, the combination of the DC boost with antibodies against PD-1 and TIM-3 released the brake from T cells, leading to improved function within the tumors and delayed tumor growth.

conclusionsOur results set forth the importance of skin DC in cancer immunotherapy, and demonstrates that restoring DC function is key to enhancing tumor immunogenicity and subsequently responsiveness to checkpoint blockade therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesCD40 AntigensCell Line, TumorCoculture TechniquesDendritic CellsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2HumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceNeoplasm StagingPoly I-CProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorSequence Analysis, RNAAntibodiesCD40 AntigensHavcr2 protein, mouseHepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsPdcd1 protein, mousePoly I-CProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptordendritic cellsimmunomodulationimmunotherapymelanomatumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID33408092
PMCPMC7789456
OpenAlexW3090593425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.