Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33408062›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology

The influence of cognitive tasks on sensory organization test performance.

Nathan Morelli, Nicholas R Heebner, Courtney J DeFeo, Matthew C Hoch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathan MorelliUniversity of Kentucky, College of Health Sciences, Sports Medicine Research Institute, Lexington, United States. Electronic address: nathan.morelli@uky.edu.
Nicholas R HeebnerUniversity of Kentucky, College of Health Sciences, Sports Medicine Research Institute, Lexington, United States.
Courtney J DeFeoUniversity of Kentucky, College of Health Sciences, Sports Medicine Research Institute, Lexington, United States.
Matthew C HochUniversity of Kentucky, College of Health Sciences, Sports Medicine Research Institute, Lexington, United States.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany static postural tasks requiring vestibular contributions are completed while dual- tasking.

objectiveWe investigated the influence of dual-tasks on sensory integration for postural control and cognitive performance during the sensory organization test and examined the relationship between cognitive function and dual-task cost during the sensory organization test.

methodsTwenty adults completed single and dual-task versions of the six conditions of the sensory organization test were completed during two visits separated by one week. A subset of 13 participants completed three National Institute of Health (NIH)-toolbox cognitive tests including the Flanker inhibitory control and attention test, dimensional change card sort test and pattern comparison processing speed test. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare postural sway during single and dual-task sensory organization test. Friedman's test, with pairwise comparison post-hoc tests, was used to compare single task serial subtraction performance to the 6 dual-task sensory organization test conditions. Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationship between cognitive performance on NIH-toolbox test and postural and cognitive dual-task cost during the sensory organization test.

resultsPerforming a cognitive dual-task during the sensory organization test resulted in a significant increase in postural sway during condition 1 (Z=-3.26, p=0.001, ES=0.73), condition 3 (Z=-2.53, p=0.012, ES=0.56), and condition 6 (Z=-2.02, p=0.044, ES=0.45). Subtraction performance significantly decreased in during condition 6 (Z=-2.479, p=0.011, ES=0.55) compared to single-task. The dimensional change card sort test demonstrated moderate correlations with dual-task cost of serial subtraction performance in condition 5 (dimensional change card sort test: r=-0.62, p=0.02) and condition 6 (dimensional change card sort test: r=-0.56, p=0.04). Pattern comparison processing speed test scores were significantly correlated with dual-task cost of postural control during condition 2.

conclusionPerforming a cognitive task during the sensory organization test resulted in significantly increased postural sway during three conditions, particularly during visual environment manipulation oppose to vestibular and somatosensory manipulation. Cognitive performance decreased during the most complex sensory organization test condition. Additionally, we found participants with poorer executive function had greater dual-task cost during more complex sensory integration demands.

Indexed as

CognitionPostural BalanceAdultAttentionHumansDual taskPostural controlSensory integration

Identifiers

PMID33408062
PMCPMC9615532
OpenAlexW3114964295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.