Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33407937›Full record

ArticleMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2021

A scoping review of severe maternal morbidity: describing risk factors and methodological approaches to inform population-based surveillance.

Lisa M Korst, Kimberly D Gregory, Lisa A Nicholas, Samia Saeb, David J Reynen, Jennifer L Troyan, Naomi Greene, Moshe Fridman

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessing the relationship between census tract rurality and severe maternal morbidity in California (1997-2018).The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Association between stillbirth and severe maternal morbidity.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lisa M KorstChildbirth Research Associates, LLC, North Hollywood, CA, USA. korst@sbcglobal.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0846-7823
Kimberly D GregoryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Burns Allen Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lisa A NicholasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Samia SaebDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Burns Allen Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David J ReynenMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Division, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Jennifer L TroyanMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Division, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Naomi GreeneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Burns Allen Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Moshe FridmanAMF Consulting, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY DURING AGING AND ALZHEIMERS DISEASER01AG010003 · NIA · MCGILL UNIVERSITY · PI POIRIER, JUDES · 1992 to 1994
–
California Department of Public Health: Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Division contract number 18-10003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent interest in using severe maternal morbidity (SMM) as a quality indicator for maternal healthcare will require the development of a standardized method for estimating hospital or regional SMM rates that includes adjustment and/or stratification for risk factors.

objectiveTo perform a scoping review to identify methodological considerations and potential covariates for risk adjustment for delivery-associated SMM. SEARCH

methodsFollowing the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews, systematic searches were conducted with the entire PubMed and EMBASE electronic databases to identify publications using the key term "severe maternal morbidity." SELECTION CRITERIA: Included studies required population-based cohort data and testing or adjustment of risk factors for SMM occurring during the delivery admission. Descriptive studies and those using surveillance-based data collection methods were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Information was extracted into a pre-defined database. Study design and eligibility, overall quality and results, SMM definitions, and patient-, hospital-, and community-level risk factors and their definitions were assessed. MAIN

resultsEligibility criteria were met by 81 studies. Methodological approaches were heterogeneous and study results could not be combined quantitatively because of wide variability in data sources, study designs, eligibility criteria, definitions of SMM, and risk-factor selection and definitions. Of the 180 potential risk factors identified, 41 were categorized as pre-existing conditions (e.g., chronic hypertension), 22 as obstetrical conditions (e.g., multiple gestation), 22 as intrapartum conditions (e.g., delivery route), 15 as non-clinical variables (e.g., insurance type), 58 as hospital-level variables (e.g., delivery volume), and 22 as community-level variables (e.g., neighborhood poverty).

conclusionsThe development of a risk adjustment strategy that will allow for SMM comparisons across hospitals or regions will require harmonization regarding: a) the standardization of the SMM definition; b) the data sources and population used; and c) the selection and definition of risk factors of interest.

Indexed as

Blood transfusionDisparitiesMaternal careObstetricsQuality indicatorsSevere maternal morbidity

Identifiers

PMID33407937
PMCPMC7789633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.