Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33407919›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2021

Implementation of an interprofessional collaboration in practice program: a feasibility study using social network analysis.

Linda C Smit, Jeroen Dikken, Nienke M Moolenaar, Marieke J Schuurmans, Niek J de Wit, Nienke Bleijenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Linda C SmitResearch Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. linda.smit@hu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5488-2967
Jeroen DikkenFaculty of Health, Nutrition and Sport, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Nienke M MoolenaarDutch Inspectorate of Education, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marieke J SchuurmansEducation Center, UMC Utrecht Academy, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Niek J de WitDepartment of General Practice, Division Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nienke BleijenbergResearch Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NLDutch Inspectorate of Education · NLThe Hague University of Applied Sciences · NLUniversity Medical Center · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

ZonMw 6330009816014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to multimorbidity and geriatric problems, older people often require both psychosocial and medical care. Collaboration between medical and social professionals is a prerequisite to deliver high-quality care for community-living older people. Effective, safe, and person-centered care relies on skilled interprofessional collaboration and practice. Little is known about interprofessional education to increase interprofessional collaboration in practice (IPCP) in the context of community care for older people. This study examines the feasibility of the implementation of an IPCP program in three community districts and determines its potential to increase interprofessional collaboration between primary healthcare professionals caring for older people.

methodA feasibility study was conducted to determine the acceptability and feasibility of data collection and analysis regarding interprofessional collaboration in network development. A questionnaire was used to measure the learning experience and the acquisition of knowledge and skills regarding the program. Network development was assessed by distributing a social network survey among professionals attending the program as well as professionals not attending the program at baseline and 5.5 months after. Network development was determined by calculating the number, reciprocity, value, and diversity of contacts between professionals using social network analysis.

resultsThe IPCP program was found to be instructive and the knowledge and skills gained were applicable in practice. Social network analysis was feasible to conduct and revealed a spill-over effect regarding network development. Program participants, as well as non-program participants, had larger, more reciprocal, and more diverse interprofessional networks than they did before the program.

conclusionsThis study showed the feasibility of implementing an IPCP program in terms of acceptability, feasibility of data collection, and social network analysis to measure network development, and indicated potential to increase interprofessional collaboration between primary healthcare professionals. Both program participants and non-program participants developed a larger, more collaborative, and diverse interprofessional network.

Indexed as

Interprofessional collaborationInterprofessional educationPrimary careSocial Network Analysis

Identifiers

PMID33407919
PMCPMC7786471
OpenAlexW3121113544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.