Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33407797›Full record

Trial reportTrials2021

Partnering with general practitioners to optimize survivorship for patients with lymphoma: a phase II randomized controlled trial (the GOSPEL I trial).

Raymond Javan Chan, Stephanie Buhagiar, Laisa Teleni, Camilla Simonsen, Jane Turner, Courtney Rawson, Nicolas H Hart, Lee Jones, Louisa Gordon, Ria Joseph and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Raymond Javan ChanPrincess Alexandra Hospital and Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Raymond.Chan@qut.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0248-7046
Stephanie BuhagiarDivision of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Laisa TeleniPrincess Alexandra Hospital and Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Camilla SimonsenDivision of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital and Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jane TurnerFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland and Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Courtney RawsonDivision of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital and Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Nicolas H HartCancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Lee JonesPrincess Alexandra Hospital and Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Louisa GordonQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ria JosephCancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Oluwaseyifunmi Andi AgbejulePrincess Alexandra Hospital and Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Fiona HendersonDivision of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Joel RheeUniversity of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Marissa RyanDivision of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Christine CarringtonDivision of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Sally MappDivision of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital and Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

Health Innovation, Investment and Research Office N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival rates for lymphoma are highest amongst hematological malignancies. In 2019, it was estimated that over 6400 Australians were diagnosed with lymphoma, a group of hematological malignancies with a high 5-year survival rate of ~ 76%. There is an increased focus on the promotion of wellness in survivorship and active approaches to reducing morbidity related to treatment; however, current models of follow-up care heavily rely on hospital-based specialist-led care. Maximizing the potential of general practitioners (GPs) in the ongoing management of cancer is consistent with the national health reform principles and the Cancer Council Australia's Optimal Care Pathways. GPs are well positioned to provide guideline-based follow-up care and are more likely to address comorbidities and psychosocial issues and promote healthy lifestyle behaviors. This study aims to test the feasibility of the GOSPEL I intervention for implementing an integrated, shared care model in which cancer center specialists and community-based GPs collaborate to provide survivorship care for patients with lymphoma.

methodsWe describe a protocol for a phase II, randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation. Sixty patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma will be randomized to usual specialist-led follow-up care (as determined by the treating hematologists) or a shared follow-up care intervention (i.e., GOSPEL I). GOSPEL I is a nurse-enabled, pre-specified shared care pathway with follow-up responsibilities shared between cancer center specialists (i.e., hematologists and specialist cancer nurses) and GPs. Outcome measures assess feasibility as well as a range of patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma, patient experience of care, symptom distress, comorbidity burden, dietary intake, physical activity behaviors, financial distress/interference, and satisfaction of care. Safety indicators including hospital admission and unscheduled lymphoma clinic visits as well as process outcomes such as intervention fidelity and economic indicators will be analyzed. DISCUSSION: This trial is designed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a new model of shared care for lymphoma survivors. Patient-reported outcomes as well as potential barriers to implementation will be analyzed to inform a larger definitive clinical trial testing the effects and implementation of a shared care model on health-related quality of life of lymphoma survivors.

trial registrationAustralia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000594921 . Registered on 22 May 2020.

Indexed as

General PractitionersLymphomaAustraliaHealth Care ReformHumansNew ZealandQuality of LifeSurvivorshipHematologyLymphomaProtocolQuality of lifeRandomized controlled trialShared care

Identifiers

PMID33407797
PMCPMC7787240
OpenAlexW3118407277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.