Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33407781›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Protocol for the methamphetamine approach-avoidance training (MAAT) trial, a randomised controlled trial of personalised approach bias modification for methamphetamine use disorder.

Joshua B B Garfield, Hugh Piercy, Shalini Arunogiri, Dan I Lubman, Samuel C Campbell, Paul G Sanfilippo, Jeff Gavin, Malcolm Hopwood, Eli Kotler, Suzanne George and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua B B GarfieldMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. joshuag@turningpoint.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5076-6499
Hugh PiercyMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Shalini ArunogiriMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Dan I LubmanMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Samuel C CampbellMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Paul G SanfilippoMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jeff GavinAssociation of Participating Service Users (APSU), Self Help Addiction Resource Centre (SHARC), 140 Grange Road, Carnegie, Melbourne, Victoria, 3163, Australia.
Malcolm HopwoodDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Eli KotlerMalvern Private Hospital, 5 Wilton Vale Crescent, Malvern East, Melbourne, Victoria, 3145, Australia.
Suzanne GeorgeMalvern Private Hospital, 5 Wilton Vale Crescent, Malvern East, Melbourne, Victoria, 3145, Australia.
Goke OkedaraAlbert Road Clinic, Ramsay Health, 31-33 Albert Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia.
Lara R PiccoliSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Victoria ManningMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Eastern Health · AUMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre · AUMonash University · AUSt Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

National Centre for Clinical Research on Emerging Drugs NCR2SF10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, methamphetamine use has increased in prevalence in recent years. In Australia, there has been a dramatic increase in numbers of people seeking treatment, including residential rehabilitation, for methamphetamine use disorder (MUD). While residential rehabilitation is more effective for MUD than withdrawal treatment (i.e. "detoxification") alone, relapse rates remain high, with approximately half of rehabilitation clients using methamphetamine within 3 months of rehabilitation. "Approach bias modification" (ABM) is a computerised cognitive training approach that aims to dampen automatically triggered impulses to approach drugs and drug-related stimuli. ABM has been demonstrated to reduce alcohol relapse rates, but no randomised controlled trials of ABM for MUD have yet been conducted. We aim to test whether a novel "personalised" form of ABM, delivered during rehabilitation, reduces post-treatment methamphetamine use, relative to a sham-training control condition. Secondary outcomes will include dependence symptoms, cravings, and approach bias.

methodsWe aim to recruit 100 participants attending residential rehabilitation for MUD at 3 sites in the Melbourne metropolitan area. Participants will complete baseline measures of methamphetamine use, craving, dependence severity, and approach bias before being randomised to receiving 6 sessions of ABM or "sham" training. In the active condition, ABM will be personalised for each participant, using those methamphetamine images that they rate as most relevant to their recent methods of methamphetamine use as "avoidance" images and using positive images representing their goals or healthy sources of pleasure as "approach" images. Approach bias and craving will be re-assessed following completion of training, and methamphetamine use, dependence, and craving will be assessed 4 weeks and 3 months following discharge from residential treatment. DISCUSSION: This study is the first randomised controlled trial of ABM for MUD and also the first ABM study to test using a personalised set of both approach and avoid images for ABM training. If effective, the low cost and easy implementation of ABM means it could be widely implemented as a standard part of MUD treatment.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000072910. Registered on 30 January 2020 (prospectively registered): https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=378804&isReview=true.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasMethamphetamineAustraliaCravingHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicMethamphetamineAddictionApproach biasCognitive bias modificationMethamphetamine use disorderRehabilitationRelapse

Identifiers

PMID33407781
PMCPMC7788914
OpenAlexW3120593327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.