Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33407736›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2021

Cystic fibrosis in Tuscany: evolution of newborn screening strategies over time to the present.

Matteo Botti, Vito Terlizzi, Michela Francalanci, Daniela Dolce, Maria Chiara Cavicchi, Anna Silvia Neri, Valeria Galici, Gianfranco Mergni, Lucia Zavataro, Claudia Centrone and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo BottiTuscany Support Cystic Fibrosis Service, Department of Pediatrics, Leghorn Hospital, Leghorn, Italy.
Vito TerlizziTuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Michela FrancalanciTuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Daniela DolceTuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Maria Chiara CavicchiTuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Anna Silvia NeriTuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Valeria GaliciTuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Gianfranco MergniTuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Lucia ZavataroTuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Claudia CentroneDiagnostic Genetics Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Filippo FestiniDepartment of Pediatrics, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giovanni TaccettiTuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy. giovanni.taccetti@meyer.it.
Meyer Children's Hospital · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-threatening disease affecting about 1:3000 newborns in Caucasian populations. The introduction of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF NBS) has improved the clinical outcomes of individuals with CF through early diagnosis and early treatment. NBS strategies have been implemented over time. CF NBS was introduced extensively in 1984 in Tuscany, a region with 3.7 million people, characterized by a high allelic heterogeneity of CFTR gene. AIM AND

methodsThe aim of the study is to present the results from 34 years (1984-2018) of CF NBS, retrospectively evaluating the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the tests. In particular, we studied the impact of the introduction of DNA molecular analysis in NBS in a region with high allelic heterogeneity, such as Tuscany.

resultsOver these 34 years, 919,520 neonates were screened, using four different NBS strategies. From 1984 to 1991, CF NBS was performed by the determination of albumin on dried meconium (sensitivity 68.75%; specificity 99.82%). Subsequently, the analysis of immunoreactive trypsinogen on a blood spot was adopted as CF NBS protocol (sensitivity 83.33%; specificity 99.77%). From 1992 to 2010, this strategy was associated with lactase meconium dosage: IRT1/IRT2 + LACT protocol (sensitivity 87.50%; specificity 99.82%). From 2011, when the existing algorithm was integrated by analysis of CF causing variants of the CFTR gene (IRT1/IRT2 + LACT + IRT1/DNA protocol), a substantial improvement in sensitivity was seen (senisitivity 96.15%; specificity 99.75%). Other improved parameters with DNA analysis in the NBS programme, compared with the previous method, were the diagnosis time (52 days vs. 38 days) and the recall rate (0.58 to 0.38%).

conclusionThe inclusion of DNA analysis in the NBS was a fundamental step in improving sensitivity, even in a region with high allelic variability.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningCystic FibrosisFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInfant, NewbornItalyMaleRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCFTR allelic heterogeneityCystic fibrosisDNA molecular analysisImmunoreactive trypsinogenNewborn screening for cystic fibrosis CF NBS

Identifiers

PMID33407736
PMCPMC7788805
OpenAlexW3120431245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.