Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33407734›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2021

A case analysis of partnered research on palliative care for refugees in Jordan and Rwanda.

Sonya de Laat, Olive Wahoush, Rania Jaber, Wejdan Khater, Emmanuel Musoni, Ibraheem Abu Siam, Lisa Schwartz, Humanitarian Health Ethics Research Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Blockchain and Higher Education Diplomas.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sonya de LaatGlobal Health, McMaster University, MDCL 3500, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. delaat@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-3249
Olive WahoushSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Rania JaberDepartment of Philosophy, Institute on Ethics & Policy for Innovation, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Wejdan KhaterSchool of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Emmanuel MusoniUniversity Teaching Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda.
Ibraheem Abu SiamUnited Nations High Commission for Refugees, Amman, Jordan.
Lisa SchwartzDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Humanitarian Health Ethics Research Group
McMaster University · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali · RWImpact · CAJordan University of Science and Technology · JOUnited Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East · JO

Funding

Enhancing Learning and Research for Humanitarian Assistance 19775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis case analysis describes dilemmas and challenges of ethical partnering encountered in the process of conducting a research study that explored moral and practical dimensions of palliative care in humanitarian crisis settings. Two contexts are the focus of this case analysis: Jordan, an acute conflict-induced refugee situation, and Rwanda, a protracted conflict-induced refugee setting. The study's main goal was to better understand ways humanitarian organizations and health care providers might best support ethically and contextually appropriate palliative care in humanitarian contexts. An unintended outcome of the research was learning lessons about ethical dimensions of transnational research partnerships, which is the focus of this case analysis. DISCUSSION: There exist ongoing challenges for international collaborative research in humanitarian conflict-induced settings. Research partnerships were crucial for connecting with key stakeholders associated with the full study (e.g., refugees with life limiting illness, local healthcare providers, aid organization representatives). While important relationships were established, obstacles limited our abilities to fully attain the type of mutual partnership we aimed for. Unique challenges faced during the research included: (a) building, nurturing and sustaining respectful and equitable research partnerships between collaborators in contexts of cultural difference and global inequality; (b) appropriate ethics review and challenges of responding to local decision-maker's research needs; and (c) equity and fairness towards vulnerable populations. Research strategies were adapted and applied to respond to these challenges with a specific focus on (d) research rewards and restitution.

conclusionsThis case analysis sheds light on the importance of understanding cultural norms in all research roles, building relationships with decision makers, and developing teams that include researchers from within humanitarian crisis settings to ensure that mutually beneficial research outcomes are ethical as well as culturally and contextually relevant.

Indexed as

Ethical partnershipEthicsHumanitarian crisisPalliative careRefugeesResearch collaboration

Identifiers

PMID33407734
PMCPMC7789221
OpenAlexW3118895665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.