Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33407718›Full record

ArticlePatient safety in surgery2021

Attitudes and compliance with the WHO surgical safety checklist: a survey among surgeons and operating room staff in 138 hospitals in China.

Jie Tan, James Reeves Mbori Ngwayi, Zhaohan Ding, Yufa Zhou, Ming Li, Yujie Chen, Bingtao Hu, Jinping Liu, Daniel Edward Porter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jie TanSchool of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. tanjie@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7284-9298
James Reeves Mbori NgwayiSchool of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Zhaohan DingMedical Department, Linyi Tumour Hospital, Linyi, 276002, China.
Yufa ZhouAnaesthesiology Department, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, 315040, China.
Ming LiAnaesthesiology Department, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, 315040, China.
Yujie ChenDepartment of Trauma and Bone Tumour, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200065, China.
Bingtao HuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Luohe Central Hospital, Luohe Medical College, Luohe, 462000, China.
Jinping LiuOperating Department, The First Hospital of Tsinghua University (Beijing Huaxin Hospital), Beijing, 100016, China.
Daniel Edward PorterDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Hospital of Tsinghua University (Beijing Huaxin Hospital), Beijing, 100016, China.
Beijing Hua Xin Hospital · CNNingbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital · CNTsinghua University · CNLinyi People's Hospital · CNLuohe Medical College · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTen years after the introduction of the Chinese Ministry of Health (MoH) version of Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) we wished to assess the ongoing influence of the World Health Organisation (WHO) SSC by observing all three checklist components during elective surgical procedures in China, as well as survey operating room staff and surgeons more widely about the WHO SSC.

methodsA questionnaire was designed to gain authentic views on the WHO SSC. We also conducted a prospective cross-sectional study at five level 3 hospitals. Local data collectors were trained to document specific item performance. Adverse events which delayed the operation were recorded as well as the individuals leading or participating in the three SSC components.

resultsA total of 846 operating room staff and surgeons from 138 hospitals representing every mainland province responded to the survey. There was widespread acceptance of the checklist and its value in improving patient safety. 860 operations were observed for SSC compliance. Overall compliance was 79.8%. Compliance in surgeon-dependent items of the 'time-out' component reduced when it was nurse-led (p < 0.0001). WHO SSC interventions which are omitted from the MoH SSC continued to be discussed over half the time. Overall adverse events rate was 2.7%. One site had near 100% compliance in association with a circulating inspection team which had power of sanction.

conclusionThe WHO SSC remains a powerful tool for surgical patient safety in China. Cultural changes in nursing assertiveness and surgeon-led teamwork and checklist ownership are the key elements for improving compliance. Standardised audits are required to monitor and ensure checklist compliance.

Indexed as

ChinaComplianceWHO safety checklist

Identifiers

PMID33407718
PMCPMC7788865
OpenAlexW3120367625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.