Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33407586›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2021

Splenic switch-off as a predictor for coronary adenosine response: validation against 13N-ammonia during co-injection myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner.

Dimitri Patriki, Elia von Felten, Adam Bakula, Andreas A Giannopoulos, Christel H Kamani, Moritz Schwyzer, Michael Messerli, Dominik C Benz, Catherine Gebhard, Christoph Gräni and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnosis of multivessel coronary artery disease usingJapanese journal of radiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How to assess nonresponsiveness to vasodilator stress.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Extracardiac findings with increased perfusion during clinical O-15-HJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dimitri PatrikiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elia von FeltenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Adam BakulaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas A GiannopoulosDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christel H KamaniDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Moritz SchwyzerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael MesserliDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dominik C BenzDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Catherine GebhardDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph GräniDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Aju P PazhenkottilDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Philipp A KaufmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tobias A FuchsDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ronny R BuechelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. ronny.buechel@usz.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-8064-8904
University Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInadequate coronary adenosine response is a potential cause for false negative ischemia testing. Recently, the splenic switch-off (SSO) sign has been identified as a promising tool to ascertain the efficacy of adenosine during vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). We assessed the value of SSO to predict adenosine response, defined as an increase in myocardial blood flow (MBF) during quantitative stress myocardial perfusion 13 N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET).

methodsWe prospectively enrolled 64 patients who underwent simultaneous CMR and PET myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner with co-injection of gadolinium based contrast agent (GBCA) and 13N-ammonia during rest and adenosine-induced stress. A myocardial flow reserve (MFR) of  > 1.5 or ischemia as assessed by PET were defined as markers for adequate coronary adenosine response. The presence or absence of SSO was visually assessed. The stress-to-rest intensity ratio (SIR) was calculated as the ratio of stress over rest peak signal intensity for splenic tissue. Additionally, the spleen-to-myocardium ratio, defined as the relative change of spleen to myocardial signal, was calculated for stress (SMR

resultsSixty-one (95%) patients were coronary adenosine responders, but SSO was absent in 18 (28%) patients. SIR and SMR

conclusionsThe presence of SSO implies adequate coronary adenosine-induced MBF response. Its absence, however, is not a reliable indicator for failed adenosine-induced coronary vasodilatation.

Indexed as

AmmoniaCoronary CirculationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyocardial Perfusion ImagingNitrogen RadioisotopesPositron-Emission TomographyAdenosineAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingMyocardial IschemiaPredictive Value of TestsAdenosineAmmoniaNitrogen RadioisotopesVasodilator AgentsCardiovascular magnetic resonance imagingMyocardial perfusion imagingSplenic switch-off

Identifiers

PMID33407586
PMCPMC7789581
OpenAlexW3118897662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.