Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33407569›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2021

Response shift in health-related quality of life measures in the presence of formative indicators.

Silvia Testa, Daniela Di Cuonzo, Giuliana Ritorto, Laura Fanchini, Sara Bustreo, Patrizia Racca, Rosalba Rosato

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia TestaDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Aosta Valley, Aosta, Italy.
Daniela Di CuonzoDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Giuliana RitortoSSD Colorectal Cancer Unit, Dipartimento Di Oncologia, "Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino" Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Laura FanchiniSSD Colorectal Cancer Unit, Dipartimento Di Oncologia, "Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino" Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Sara BustreoSSD Colorectal Cancer Unit, Dipartimento Di Oncologia, "Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino" Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Patrizia RaccaSSD Colorectal Cancer Unit, Dipartimento Di Oncologia, "Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino" Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Rosalba RosatoDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. rosalba.rosato@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4921-374X
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITPiedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention · ITUniversity of Aosta Valley · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResponse shift (RS) has been defined as a change in the meaning of an individual's self-evaluation that needs to be accounted for when assessing longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RS detection through structural equation modeling is accomplished by adopting Oort's procedure based on a measurement model in which the observed variables are defined as reflective indicators of the HRQoL latent variable; that is, the latent variable causes the variation in the reflective indicators. This study aims to propose a procedure that assesses RS when formative indicators are used in measuring HRQoL; in this last case, the latent variable is considered to be a function of some formative indicators. A secondary aim is to compare the new procedure with Oort's procedure to highlight similarities and differences.

methodsThe data were retrieved from a consecutive series of 258 patients newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer and undergoing chemotherapy and/or surgery. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QOL-C30) was administered twice, once before and once six months after treatment. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate RS and true change with the newly proposed method (in which fatigue and pain were defined as formative indicators) and with Oort's procedure (in which fatigue and pain were defined as reflective indicators).

resultsAccording to the new procedure, there was no measurement bias, and on average, patients' quality of life improved by 3.53 points (on a scale ranging from 0 to 100) at the 6-month follow-up. With Oort's procedure, the loading of the pain indicator was not invariant across the two time points, suggesting the presence of reprioritization, whereas the estimation of true change was very similar to the previous one: 3.87.

conclusionsRS and true change in HRQoL can be evaluated in the presence of formative indicators. Defining a measurement model by formative or reflective indicators can lead to different results.

Indexed as

Latent Class AnalysisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesFormative indicatorsHealth-related quality of lifeReflective indicatorsResponse shift

Identifiers

PMID33407569
PMCPMC7789337
OpenAlexW3119903327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.