Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33407429›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Generating real-world evidence from unstructured clinical notes to examine clinical utility of genetic tests: use case in BRCAness.

Yiqing Zhao, Saravut J Weroha, Ellen L Goode, Hongfang Liu, Chen Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Automating Access to Real-World Evidence.JTO clinical and research reports · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yiqing ZhaoDivision of Digital Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 205 3rd Ave SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Saravut J WerohaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Ellen L GoodeDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 205 3rd Ave SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Hongfang LiuDivision of Digital Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 205 3rd Ave SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Chen WangDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 205 3rd Ave SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. wang.chen@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2638-3081

Funding

Use of microfluidic tumor cultures to enable clinical trials of therapies for ovarian cancerP50CA136393 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ELLEN L. GOODE · 2009 to 2026
$37.0M
Relating Molecular Subgroups of Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancers to Survival and RiskR01CA248288 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Stacey J Winham · 2021 to 2026
$4.8M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA136393NCI NIH HHS R01 CA248288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNext-generation sequencing provides comprehensive information about individuals' genetic makeup and is commonplace in oncology clinical practice. However, the utility of genetic information in the clinical decision-making process has not been examined extensively from a real-world, data-driven perspective. Through mining real-world data (RWD) from clinical notes, we could extract patients' genetic information and further associate treatment decisions with genetic information.

methodsWe proposed a real-world evidence (RWE) study framework that incorporates context-based natural language processing (NLP) methods and data quality examination before final association analysis. The framework was demonstrated in a Foundation-tested women cancer cohort (N = 196). Upon retrieval of patients' genetic information using NLP system, we assessed the completeness of genetic data captured in unstructured clinical notes according to a genetic data-model. We examined the distribution of different topics regarding BRCA1/2 throughout patients' treatment process, and then analyzed the association between BRCA1/2 mutation status and the discussion/prescription of targeted therapy.

resultsWe identified seven topics in the clinical context of genetic mentions including: Information, Evaluation, Insurance, Order, Negative, Positive, and Variants of unknown significance. Our rule-based system achieved a precision of 0.87, recall of 0.93 and F-measure of 0.91. Our machine learning system achieved a precision of 0.901, recall of 0.899 and F-measure of 0.9 for four-topic classification and a precision of 0.833, recall of 0.823 and F-measure of 0.82 for seven-topic classification. We found in result-containing sentences, the capture of BRCA1/2 mutation information was 75%, but detailed variant information (e.g. variant types) is largely missing. Using cleaned RWD, significant associations were found between BRCA1/2 positive mutation and targeted therapies.

conclusionsIn conclusion, we demonstrated a framework to generate RWE using RWD from different clinical sources. Rule-based NLP system achieved the best performance for resolving contextual variability when extracting RWD from unstructured clinical notes. Data quality issues such as incompleteness and discrepancies exist thus manual data cleaning is needed before further analysis can be performed. Finally, we were able to use cleaned RWD to evaluate the real-world utility of genetic information to initiate a prescription of targeted therapy.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingData AccuracyFemaleHumansLanguageMachine LearningBRCA1/2Electronic health recordsNatural language processingPARP inhibitorPrecision medicineReal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID33407429
PMCPMC7789545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.