Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33407416›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

Positive effects of lumbar puncture simulation training for medical students in clinical practice.

Sinead Gaubert, Alice Blet, Fadia Dib, Pierre-François Ceccaldi, Thomas Brock, Maude Calixte, Léa De Macédo, Tiphaine Dujardin, Ludivine Jean-Louis, Dhihia Leghima and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Sim and Learn: Simulation and its Value in Neurology Education.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Importance of simulation-based medical education and its application in diabetology.Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sinead GaubertUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Alice BletUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Fadia DibINSERM CIC 1417, F-CRIN, I REIVAC, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, F-75014, Paris, France.
Pierre-François CeccaldiUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Thomas BrockUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Maude CalixteUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Léa De MacédoUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Tiphaine DujardinUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Ludivine Jean-LouisUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Dhihia LeghimaUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Samuel MouyalUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Dan David TordjmanUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Patrick PlaisanceUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Caroline RoosUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Sid-Ahmed ReminiUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Damien RouxUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France.
Claire PaquetUniversité de Paris, Medical School, Paris, France. claire.paquet@inserm.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2273-7316
Université Paris Cité · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLumbar puncture (LP) is an invasive medical procedure that can be done by any doctor. Several simulation-based trainings have been built however the evaluations of the theoretical knowledge and the impact of the simulation-based training have never been performed in real life. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a LP training on the theoretical knowledge improvement and the performance of a LP in clinical practice.

methodsBefore and after medical students' training, theoretical knowledge and confidence level were assessed. Over a 6 months period, the impact of simulation training was evaluated by the success rate of students' first LP carried out in hospitalized patients and compared to the results of a no-training control.

resultsStudents' theoretical knowledge and confidence level showed significant improvement after simulation training on 115 students (p < 0.0001). The evaluation in real life based on 41 students showed that the success rate of the first LP in patients was higher in the LP simulation group compared to the control group (67% vs 14%, p = 0.0025). The technical assistance was also less frequently needed in the LP simulation group (19% vs 57%, respectively, p = 0.017). The rate of students who participated in this educational study was low. DISCUSSION: Simulation-based teaching was an effective way to improve students' theoretical and practical knowledge. Whether this approach translates to other procedural skills in real clinical settings merits further study. The low participation rate in the study is due to the fact that students are not used to be included in educational studies and to the complexity of evaluation in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

PhysiciansSimulation TrainingStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceHumansSpinal PunctureClinical skillsLumbar punctureMedical educationMedical studentSimulation training

Identifiers

PMID33407416
PMCPMC7789333
OpenAlexW3118482516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.