Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33407383›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Attitude of nursing students following the implementation of comprehensive computer-based nursing process in medical surgical internship: a quasi-experimental study.

Kobra Parvan, Fahimeh Alsadat Hosseini, Madineh Jasemi, Brian Thomson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06162000 (Investigation of the Effect of Decision Support System Integrated Nursing Care Plan Management System on Student Nurses' Care Plan Preparation Skills), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06162000 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of the Effect of Decision Support System Integrated Nursing Care Plan Management System on Student Nurses' Care Plan Preparation Skills

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled42ConditionsNurse's RoleArmsThe group that will use the developed software in case studies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kobra ParvanMedical Education Research Center, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran.
Fahimeh Alsadat HosseiniDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Ibn Sina Square, Fasa, Fars Province, Iran. fhoseini221@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5943-9294
Madineh JasemiDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Brian ThomsonSchool of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, Scotland.
Fasa University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Tabriz · IRUniversity of the West of Scotland · GBUrmia University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nursing process is the core and the standard of practice in nursing profession. Nowadays, the use of information technology in the field of nursing processes, education and practice has been emphasized. Since nurse's attitudes towards clinical information systems are considered as an indicator of the success rate of information systems, and nurse's attitudes about the nursing process can affect their execution of the process. So the purpose of this study was to evaluate nursing students' attitudes towards the nursing process software.

methodsIn this quasi-experimental study, 160 undergraduate nursing students (terms 4-8) in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences were selected by convenience sampling. To evaluate the effectiveness of nursing process software in this study, Mazlom and Rajabpoor (IJME 14(4):312-322, 2014) a questionnaire consisting of 21 components based on a five-point Likert scale was completed by students after using the software. Data were then analyzed by SPSS 19 software.

resultsThe mean score of students' attitude toward nursing process software was high (80.70 ± 5.58). The nursing students' highest scoring attitudes were respectively related to "Effectiveness of software in prioritizing patient care and problems", "Completeness of patient's electronic information compared to handwritten mode" and "Software's effectiveness in saving your time". The lowest scoring attitudes towards the software was respectively related to the "feeling of fairness in labor division", "the effectiveness of the software in determining your workload" and "the feeling of satisfaction in labor division". There was a statistically significant relationship between gender and age, and student's attitude toward nursing process software.

conclusionsAccording to the results and analysis of nursing student's attitudes toward nursing process software, the use of such software would be welcomed by students. It seems that changing policies in the educational and clinical substructure of nursing in order to develop, adapt and use the nursing process software is an important responsibility for nursing authorities to consider. Providing educational and clinical technology equipment, periodic evaluation of software by stakeholders and promoting the use of this software, can be fundamental steps in operationalizing the findings of this research.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, BaccalaureateInternship and ResidencyNursing ProcessStudents, NursingAttitude of Health PersonnelComputersHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudeNursing processNursing studentSoftware

Identifiers

PMID33407383
PMCPMC7789241
OpenAlexW3120556891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.