ArticleBMC medical imaging2021
Melanoma diagnosis using deep learning techniques on dermatoscopic images.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnosis and prognosis of melanoma from dermoscopy images using machine learning and deep learning: a systematic literature review.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Critical Analysis of the Current Medical Image-Based Processing Techniques for Automatic Disease Evaluation: Systematic Literature Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- New Trends in Melanoma Detection Using Neural Networks: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Deep Learning-Assisted Early Detection of Skin Cancer from Dermoscopic Images in Underserved Clinical Settings.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Clinical Significance of Imaging Biomarkers Discoverable by Anomaly Detection Methods in Retinal Diseases: A Review.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Clinical Application of Vision Transformers for Melanoma Classification: A Multi-Dataset Evaluation Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Article
- Automatic melanoma detection using an optimized five-stream convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing the Efficacy of the Spectrum-Aided Vision Enhancer (SAVE) to Detect Acral Lentiginous Melanoma, Melanoma In Situ, Nodular Melanoma, and Superficial Spreading Melanoma: Part II.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Skin cancer detection using dermoscopic images with convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Training State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Algorithms with Visible and Extended Near-Infrared Multispectral Images of Skin Lesions for the Improvement of Skin Cancer Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based object detection algorithms in medical imaging: Systematic review.Heliyon · 2025Review
- Advances in computer vision and deep learning-facilitated early detection of melanoma.Briefings in functional genomics · 2025Review
- An Enhanced Approach Using AGS Network for Skin Cancer Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhancing Skin Cancer Diagnosis Through Fine-Tuning of Pretrained Models: A Two-Phase Transfer Learning Approach.International journal of breast cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Multimodality Fusion Aspects of Medical Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Lightweight convolutional neural network for chest X-ray images classification.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Skin Cancer Image Classification Using Artificial Intelligence Strategies: A Systematic Review.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Diagnosing skin cancer using social spider optimization (SSO) and error correcting output codes (ECOC) with weighted hamming distance.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMelanoma has become more widespread over the past 30 years and early detection is a major factor in reducing mortality rates associated with this type of skin cancer. Therefore, having access to an automatic, reliable system that is able to detect the presence of melanoma via a dermatoscopic image of lesions and/or skin pigmentation can be a very useful tool in the area of medical diagnosis.
methodsAmong state-of-the-art methods used for automated or computer assisted medical diagnosis, attention should be drawn to Deep Learning based on Convolutional Neural Networks, wherewith segmentation, classification and detection systems for several diseases have been implemented. The method proposed in this paper involves an initial stage that automatically crops the region of interest within a dermatoscopic image using the Mask and Region-based Convolutional Neural Network technique, and a second stage based on a ResNet152 structure, which classifies lesions as either "benign" or "malignant".
resultsTraining, validation and testing of the proposed model was carried out using the database associated to the challenge set out at the 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. On the test data set, the proposed model achieves an increase in accuracy and balanced accuracy of 3.66% and 9.96%, respectively, with respect to the best accuracy and the best sensitivity/specificity ratio reported to date for melanoma detection in this challenge. Additionally, unlike previous models, the specificity and sensitivity achieve a high score (greater than 0.8) simultaneously, which indicates that the model is good for accurate discrimination between benign and malignant lesion, not biased towards any of those classes.
conclusionsThe results achieved with the proposed model suggest a significant improvement over the results obtained in the state of the art as far as performance of skin lesion classifiers (malignant/benign) is concerned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.