Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33407204›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Perturbation-based balance training to improve balance control and reduce falls in older adults - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Marissa H G Gerards, Rik G J Marcellis, Martijn Poeze, Antoine F Lenssen, Kenneth Meijer, Rob A de Bie

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dynamic Stability Analysis of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Affected Gait Using Lyapunov Floquet Theory.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marissa H G GerardsDepartment of Physical therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands. marissa.gerards@mumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7388-2356
Rik G J MarcellisDepartment of Physical therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Martijn PoezeDepartment of Surgery, division of Trauma surgery, MUMC+, Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Antoine F LenssenDepartment of Physical therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Kenneth MeijerSchool of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism NUTRIM, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rob A de BieDepartment of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Peter Debyeplein 1, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalls are a common cause of injuries and hospitalization among older adults. While conventional balance training appears effective in preventing falls, a relatively large number of training sessions are needed and retention of the effects after the training period is hard to accomplish. This may be because these interventions are not sufficiently task-specific for the mechanism of falls. Many falls in older adults occur due to unexpected external perturbations during gait, such as trips. Therefore, there is increasing interest in perturbation-based balance training (PBT), which is a more task-specific intervention to improve reactive balance control after unexpected perturbations. The literature suggests that PBT may be more effective and require fewer training sessions to reduce falls incidence in older adults, than conventional balance training. We aim to evaluate the effect of a three-session PBT protocol on balance control, daily life falls and fear of falling. Secondly, we will evaluate the acceptability of the PBT protocol.

methodsThis is a mixed-methods study combining a single-blind (outcome assessor) randomized controlled trial (RCT) using a parallel-group design, and qualitative research evaluating the acceptability of the intervention. The study sample consists of community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years and older who have recently fallen and visited the MUMC+ outpatient clinic. Subjects are randomized into two groups. The control group (n = 40) receives usual care, meaning referral to a physical therapist. The intervention group (n = 40) receives usual care plus three 30-min sessions of PBT in the Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment. Subjects' balance control (Mini-BESTest) and fear of falling (FES-I) will be assessed at baseline, and 4 weeks and 3 months post-baseline. Daily life falls will be recorded with falls calendars until 6 months after the first follow-up measurement, long-term injurious falls will be recorded at 2-years' follow-up via the electronic patient record. Acceptability of the PBT protocol will be evaluated with semi-structured interviews in a subsample from the intervention group. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute to the evidence for the effectiveness of PBT using a training protocol based on the available literature, and also give much needed insights into the acceptability of PBT for older adults.

trial registrationNederlands Trial Register NL7680 . Registered 17-04-2019 - retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyPostural BalanceAgedGaitHumansIndependent LivingRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAccidental fallsAgedBalanceOlder adultsPerturbationPrevention

Identifiers

PMID33407204
PMCPMC7788687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.