Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33406899›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2022

Peptide Enhanced Bone Graft Substitute Presents Improved Short-Term Increase in Bone Volume and Construct Stiffness Compared to Iliac Crest Autologous Bone in an Ovine Lumbar Interbody Fusion Model.

Arjan C Y Loenen, Jerome Connor, Scott Johnson, Katherine Davis, Nolan Hannigan, Tristan Barnes, Jacobus J Arts, Bert van Rietbergen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05038527 (ABM/P-15 Bone Graft vs Traditional Bone Graft in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery - a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05038527 nacompletednot on this map

ABM/P-15 Bone Graft vs Traditional Bone Graft in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery - a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2021 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsSpine Deformity, Bone Graft, Complications, Adverse EventsArmsABM/P-15 bone graft
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Advances in Synthetic Grafts in Spinal Fusion Surgery.International journal of spine surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arjan C Y LoenenLaboratory for Experimental Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7306-0758
Jerome ConnorCerapedics, Inc, Westminster, CO, USA.
Scott JohnsonCerapedics, Inc, Westminster, CO, USA.
Katherine DavisCerapedics, Inc, Westminster, CO, USA.
Nolan HanniganCerapedics, Inc, Westminster, CO, USA.
Tristan BarnesCerapedics, Inc, Westminster, CO, USA.
Jacobus J ArtsLaboratory for Experimental Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Bert van RietbergenLaboratory for Experimental Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designPreclinical ovine model.

objectiveTo assess the

methodsThirty skeletally mature sheep underwent lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Half of the sheep received autologous ICBG and the other half the peptide enhanced bone graft substitute (P-15 L). Following termination at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, the operated segments were analyzed using micro computed tomography (µCT), histology, and destructive mechanical testing. Additional systemic health monitoring was performed for the P-15 L group.

resultsOne month after surgery, there was only minor evidence of bone remodeling and residual graft material could be clearly observed within the cage. There was active bone remodeling between 1 and 3 months after surgery. At 3 months after surgery significantly denser and stiffer bone was found in the P-15 L group, whereas at 6 months, P-15 L and ICBG gave similar fusion results. The P-15 L bone graft substitute did not have any adverse effects on systemic health.

conclusionsThe drug device combination P-15 L was demonstrated to be effective and save for lumbar interbody fusion as evidenced by this ovine model. Compared to autologous ICBG, P-15 L seems to expedite bone formation and remodeling but in the longer-term fusion results were similar.

Indexed as

bone graft substitutelumbar interbody fusionmorphological analysisovinep-15 peptide

Identifiers

PMID33406899
PMCPMC9393976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.