Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33406752›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

RNA-Based Assay for Next-Generation Sequencing of Clinically Relevant Gene Fusions in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Caterina De Luca, Francesco Pepe, Antonino Iaccarino, Pasquale Pisapia, Luisella Righi, Angela Listì, Lorenza Greco, Gianluca Gragnano, Severo Campione, Gianfranco De Dominicis and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Next-generation sequencing using a targeted gene panel in advanced solid tumors: five years of experience from an Italian referral institution.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The ideal reporting ofPathologica · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Next generation sequencing in cytology.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Caterina De LucaDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6932-763X
Francesco PepeDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Antonino IaccarinoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Pasquale PisapiaDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6429-0620
Luisella RighiDepartment of Oncology, San Luigi University Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Angela ListìDepartment of Oncology, San Luigi University Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Lorenza GrecoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Gianluca GragnanoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Severo CampioneAnatomic Pathology, A.O.R.N. Antonio Cardarelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Gianfranco De DominicisAnatomic Pathology, A.O.R.N. Antonio Cardarelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Fabio PagniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9625-1637
Roberta SgarigliaDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Mariantonia NacchioDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Rossella TufanoCEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate, Via Gaetano Salvatore 486, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Floriana ConticelliDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Elena VigliarDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2856-9023
Claudio BellevicineDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7479-6457
Diego Luigi CortinovisDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Silvia NovelloAnatomic Pathology, A.O.R.N. Antonio Cardarelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Miguel Angel Molina-VilaLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8866-9881
Rafael RosellCancer Biology and Precision Medicine Program Catalan Institute of Oncology, Germans Trias i Pujol Health Sciences Institute and Hospital Badalona, 08916 Barcelona, Spain.
Giancarlo TronconeDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1630-5805
Umberto MalapelleDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3211-9957
University of Naples Federico II · ITOspedale Antonio Cardarelli · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Turin · ITCeinge Biotecnologie Avanzate (Italy) · ITInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ES

Funding

Regione Campania D.G.R. Campania n.180/2019Regione Campania POR Campania FESR 2014-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene fusions represent novel predictive biomarkers for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we validated a narrow NGS gene panel able to cover therapeutically-relevant gene fusions and splicing events in advanced-stage NSCLC patients. To this aim, we first assessed minimal complementary DNA (cDNA) input and the limit of detection (LoD) in different cell lines. Then, to evaluate the feasibility of applying our panel to routine clinical samples, we retrospectively selected archived lung adenocarcinoma histological and cytological (cell blocks) samples. Overall, our SiRe RNA fusion panel was able to detect all fusions and a splicing event harbored in a RNA pool diluted up to 2 ng/µL. It also successfully analyzed 46 (95.8%) out of 48 samples. Among these, 43 (93.5%) out of 46 samples reproduced the same results as those obtained with conventional techniques. Intriguingly, the three discordant results were confirmed by a CE-IVD automated real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis (Easy PGX platform, Diatech Pharmacogenetics, Jesi, Italy). Based on these findings, we conclude that our new SiRe RNA fusion panel is a valid and robust tool for the detection of clinically relevant gene fusions and splicing events in advanced NSCLC.

Indexed as

gene fusionsnext generation sequencingNSCLCpredictive molecular pathologytargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID33406752
PMCPMC7796105
OpenAlexW3120836426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.