Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33406410›Full record

ArticleNeuron2021

Top-down coordination of local cortical state during selective attention.

Jochem van Kempen, Marc A Gieselmann, Michael Boyd, Nicholas A Steinmetz, Tirin Moore, Tatiana A Engel, Alexander Thiele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Invertebrate brains as diversified models for understanding sleep mechanisms and function.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Input-dependent directionality of interactions between cortical areas.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Cortex-wide Dynamics of Internal Decisions About Behavioral Context.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Common and distinct neural mechanisms of attention.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Why is everyone talking about brain state?Trends in neurosciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jochem van KempenBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK. Electronic address: jochem.van-kempen@newcastle.ac.uk.
Marc A GieselmannBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Michael BoydBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Nicholas A SteinmetzDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Tirin MooreHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Tatiana A EngelCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA.
Alexander ThieleBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.

Funding

Interaction of Visual and Oculomotor Signals in CortexR01EY014924 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, TIRIN · 2004 to 2024
$7.3M
Discovering dynamic computations from large-scale neural activity recordingsR01EB026949 · NIBIB · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI ENGEL, TATIANA · 2018 to 2020
$1.3M
Interaction of Visual and Oculomotor Signals in CortexR56EY014924 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, TIRIN · 2009 to 2009
$398k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F021399/1Howard Hughes Medical InstituteMedical Research Council G0700976Medical Research Council MR/K013785/1Medical Research Council MR/P013031/1NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014924NEI NIH HHS R56 EY014924NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026949Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 093104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous fluctuations in cortical excitability influence sensory processing and behavior. These fluctuations, long thought to reflect global changes in cortical state, were recently found to be modulated locally within a retinotopic map during spatially selective attention. We report that periods of vigorous (On) and faint (Off) spiking activity, the signature of cortical state fluctuations, are coordinated across brain areas with retinotopic precision. Top-down attention enhanced interareal local state coordination, traversing along the reverse cortical hierarchy. The extent of local state coordination between areas was predictive of behavioral performance. Our results show that cortical state dynamics are shared across brain regions, modulated by cognitive demands and relevant for behavior.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsPhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual FieldsVisual PathwaysVisual Perceptionattentioncortical stateelectrophysiologyfeedbackfeedforwardFEFmacaqueV1V4vision

Identifiers

PMID33406410
PMCPMC7927916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.