Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33406154›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Development and evaluation of a multiplex loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and non-tuberculosis mycobacterium in clinical samples.

Jeeyong Kim, Borae G Park, Da Hye Lim, Woong Sik Jang, Jeonghun Nam, Do-CiC Mihn, Chae Seung Lim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeeyong KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0426-2572
Borae G ParkDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9710-9253
Da Hye LimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woong Sik JangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeonghun NamDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Do-CiC MihnDepartment of Diagnostic Immunology, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chae Seung LimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Korea University Medical Center · KR

Funding

PROVIDE RABBITS, RATS MICE, HAMSTERS GERBILS, GUINEA PIGS27307C0012 · NIEHS · PI BOLEN, WAYNE · 2007 to 2007
$1.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS 27307C0012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe rapid and accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is important to reduce morbidity and mortality rates and risk of transmission. Therefore, molecular detection methods such as a real-time PCR-based assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) have been commonly used for diagnosis of TB. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay was believed to be a simple, quick, and cost-effective isothermal nucleic acid amplification diagnostic test for infectious diseases. In this study, we designed an in-house multiplex LAMP assay for the differential detection of MTB and non-tuberculosis mycobacterium (NTM), and evaluated the assay using clinical samples. MATERIAL AND

methodsFor the multiplex LAMP assay, two sets of specific primers were designed: the first one was specific for IS6110 genes of MTB, and the second one was universal for rpoB genes of mycobacterium species including NTM. MTB was confirmed with a positive reaction with both primer sets, and NTM was identified with a positive reaction by only the second primer set without a MTB-specific reaction. Total 333 clinical samples were analyzed to evaluate the multiplex LAMP assay. Clinical samples were composed of 195 positive samples (72 MTB and 123NTM) and 138 negative samples. All samples were confirmed positivity or negativity by real-time PCR for MTB and NTM. Analytical sensitivity and specificity were evaluated for the multiplex LAMP assay in comparison with acid fast bacilli staining and the culture method.

resultsOf 123 NTM samples, 121 were identified as NTM and 72/72 MTB were identified as MTB by the multiplex LAMP assay. False negative reactions were seen only in two NTM positive samples with co-infection of Candida spp. All 138 negative samples were identified as negative for MTB and NTM. Analytical sensitivity of the multiplex LAMP assay was 100% (72/72) for MTB, and 98.4% (121/123) for NTM. And the specificity of assay was 100% (138/138) for all.

conclusionsOur newly designed multiplex LAMP assay for MTB and NTM showed relatively good sensitivity in comparison with previously published data to detect isolated MTB. This multiplex LAMP assay is expected to become a useful tool for detecting and differentiating MTB from NTM rapidly at an acceptable sensitivity.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycobacteriumMycobacterium tuberculosisNontuberculous MycobacteriaNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosisDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID33406154
PMCPMC7787462
OpenAlexW3119133656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.