ArticlePloS one2021
Personizing the prediction of future susceptibility to a specific disease.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RENET2: high-performance full-text gene-disease relation extraction with iterative training data expansion.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Biochemical Profiling for Antioxidant and Therapeutic Potential of Pakistani Chickpea (Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A traceable biomarker is a member of a disease's molecular pathway. A disease may be associated with several molecular pathways. Each different combination of these molecular pathways, to which detected traceable biomarkers belong, may serve as an indicative of the elicitation of the disease at a different time frame in the future. Based on this notion, we introduce a novel methodology for personalizing an individual's degree of future susceptibility to a specific disease. We implemented the methodology in a working system called Susceptibility Degree to a Disease Predictor (SDDP). For a specific disease d, let S be the set of molecular pathways, to which traceable biomarkers detected from most patients of d belong. For the same disease d, let S' be the set of molecular pathways, to which traceable biomarkers detected from a certain individual belong. SDDP is able to infer the subset S'' ⊆{S-S'} of undetected molecular pathways for the individual. Thus, SDDP can infer undetected molecular pathways of a disease for an individual based on few molecular pathways detected from the individual. SDDP can also help in inferring the combination of molecular pathways in the set {S'+S''}, whose traceable biomarkers collectively is an indicative of the disease. SDDP is composed of the following four components: information extractor, interrelationship between molecular pathways modeler, logic inferencer, and risk indicator. The information extractor takes advantage of the exponential increase of biomedical literature to automatically extract the common traceable biomarkers for a specific disease. The interrelationship between molecular pathways modeler models the hierarchical interrelationships between the molecular pathways of the traceable biomarkers. The logic inferencer transforms the hierarchical interrelationships between the molecular pathways into rule-based specifications. It employs the specification rules and the inference rules for predicate logic to infer as many as possible undetected molecular pathways of a disease for an individual. The risk indicator outputs a risk indicator value that reflects the individual's degree of future susceptibility to the disease. We evaluated SDDP by comparing it experimentally with other methods. Results revealed marked improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.