Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33405397›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2021

A protocol for cell therapy infusion in neonates.

Elizabeth K Baker, Euan M Wallace, Peter G Davis, Atul Malhotra, Susan E Jacobs, Stuart B Hooper, Rebecca Lim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A protocol for cell therapy infusion in neonates.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth K BakerNewborn Research Centre, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8523-951X
Euan M WallaceThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Victoria, Australia.
Peter G DavisNewborn Research Centre, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Atul MalhotraThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9664-4182
Susan E JacobsNewborn Research Centre, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Stuart B HooperThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Victoria, Australia.
Rebecca LimThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Victoria, Australia.
Hudson Institute of Medical Research · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell therapies for neonatal morbidities are progressing to early phase clinical trials. However, protocols for intravenous (IV) delivery of cell therapies to infants have not been evaluated. It has been assumed the cell dose prescribed is the dose delivered. Early in our clinical trial of human amnion epithelial cells (hAECs), we observed cells settling in the syringe and IV tubing used to deliver the suspension. The effect on dose delivery was unknown. We aimed to quantify this observation and determine an optimal protocol for IV delivery of hAECs to extremely preterm infants. A standard pediatric infusion protocol was modeled in the laboratory. A syringe pump delivered the hAEC suspension over 60 minutes via a pediatric blood transfusion set (200-μm filter and 2.2 mL IV line). The infusion protocol was varied by agitation methods, IV-line volumes (0.2-2.2 mL), albumin concentrations (2% vs 4%), and syringe orientations (horizontal vs vertical) to assess whether these variables influenced the dose delivered. The influence of flow rate (3-15 mL/h) was assessed after other variables were optimized. The standard infusion protocol delivered 17.6% ± 9% of the intended hAEC dose. Increasing albumin concentration to 4%, positioning the syringe and IV line vertically, and decreasing IV-line volume to 0.6 mL delivered 99.7% ± 13% of the intended hAEC dose. Flow rate did not affect dose delivery. Cell therapy infusion protocols must be considered. We describe the refinement of a cell infusion protocol that delivers intended cell doses and could form the basis of future neonatal cell delivery protocols.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureAlbuminsAmnionCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyEpithelial CellsHumansInfant, NewbornInfusions, IntravenousSyringesAlbuminsbronchopulmonary dysplasiacell- and tissue-based therapyhuman amnion epithelial cellsinfant, prematureinfusions, intravenous

Identifiers

PMID33405397
PMCPMC8046110
OpenAlexW3119802135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.