Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33405231›Full record

ArticleCancer2021

Ultrasensitive detection of tumor-specific mutations in saliva of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Ashwini Shanmugam, Arun K Hariharan, Rifat Hasina, Jayalakshmi R Nair, Shanmukh Katragadda, Sivaraj Irusappan, Aarthi Ravichandran, Vamsi Veeramachaneni, Radhakrishna Bettadapura, Muddasir Bhati and 15 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Biological biomarkers of oral cancer.Periodontology 2000 · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashwini ShanmugamStrand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4999-2528
Arun K HariharanStrand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8081-1695
Rifat HasinaSection of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Jayalakshmi R NairStrand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Shanmukh KatragaddaStrand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4536-2705
Sivaraj IrusappanStrand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Aarthi RavichandranStrand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Vamsi VeeramachaneniStrand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Radhakrishna BettadapuraStrand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Muddasir BhatiDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Veena RamaswamyStrand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Vishal U S RaoHealthCare Global Cancer Center, Bangalore, India.
Ritvi K BagadiaHealthCare Global Cancer Center, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9870-8530
Ashwini ManjunathStrand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8317-4641
N M L ManjunathHealthCare Global Cancer Center, Bangalore, India.
Monica Charlotte SolomonDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Shiuli MajiStrand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Urvashi BahadurStrand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Chetan BettegowdaLudwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Nickolas PapadopoulosLudwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-7135-7451
Mark W LingenDepartment of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Ramesh HariharanStrand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Vaijayanti GuptaStrand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8716-5307
Nishant AgrawalSection of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Evgeny IzumchenkoDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0003-3500-5664
Strand Life Sciences (India) · INUniversity of Chicago · USHealthcare Global Enterprises · INJohns Hopkins University · USManipal Academy of Higher Education · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

Multi-analyte Approach for Earlier Detection of Cancers in Non Plasma BiofluidsU01CA230691 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Nishant Agrawal, CHETAN BETTEGOWDA · 2018 to 2026
$6.7M
Delineating chromatin-related gene expression signatures as a function of HNSCC progressionR01DE027809 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI GAYKALOVA, DARIA A, IZUMCHENKO, EVGENY (EUGENE) G · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
Interrogating malignant gliomas using released tumor DNA in cerebrospinal fluidR37CA230400 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BETTEGOWDA, CHETAN · 2018 to 2024
$2.6M
Somatic Mutations in Tissue and Saliva as Prognostic and Screening Biomarkers for Oral PremalignancyR01DE028674 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI AGRAWAL, NISHANT, LINGEN, MARK W. · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA230400NCI NIH HHS U01 CA230691NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE027809NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE028674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is the most common head and neck malignancy. Although the survival rate of patients with advanced-stage disease remains approximately 20% to 60%, when detected at an early stage, the survival rate approaches 80%, posing a pressing need for a well validated profiling method to assess patients who have a high risk of developing OCSCC. Tumor DNA detection in saliva may provide a robust biomarker platform that overcomes the limitations of current diagnostic tests. However, there is no routine saliva-based screening method for patients with OCSCC.

methodsThe authors designed a custom next-generation sequencing panel with unique molecular identifiers that covers coding regions of 7 frequently mutated genes in OCSCC and applied it on DNA extracted from 121 treatment-naive OCSCC tumors and matched preoperative saliva specimens.

resultsBy using stringent variant-calling criteria, mutations were detected in 106 tumors, consistent with a predicted detection rate ≥88%. Moreover, mutations identified in primary malignancies were also detected in 93% of saliva samples. To ensure that variants are not errors resulting in false-positive calls, a multistep analytical validation of this approach was performed: 1) re-sequencing of 46 saliva samples confirmed 88% of somatic variants; 2) no functionally relevant mutations were detected in saliva samples from 11 healthy individuals without a history of tobacco or alcohol; and 3) using a panel of 7 synthetic loci across 8 sequencing runs, it was confirmed that the platform developed is reproducible and provides sensitivity on par with droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.

conclusionsThe current data highlight the feasibility of somatic mutation identification in driver genes in saliva collected at the time of OCSCC diagnosis.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellDNA, NeoplasmMouth NeoplasmsSalivaBiomarkers, TumorHumansMutationBiomarkers, TumorDNA, Neoplasmearly detectionliquid biopsy. mutationnext-generation sequencing (NGS)oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC)oral rinsesaliva

Identifiers

PMID33405231
PMCPMC8084899
OpenAlexW3118735831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.