Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33405215›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Qualitative Modeling, Analysis and Control of Synthetic Regulatory Circuits.

Madalena Chaves, Hidde de Jong

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Madalena ChavesUniversité Côte d'Azur, Inria, INRAE, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Biocore Team, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Hidde de JongUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inria, Grenoble, Montbonnot, Saint Ismier Cedex, France. hidde.de-jong@inria.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Qualitative modeling approaches are promising and still underexploited tools for the analysis and design of synthetic circuits. They can make predictions of circuit behavior in the absence of precise, quantitative information. Moreover, they provide direct insight into the relation between the feedback structure and the dynamical properties of a network. We review qualitative modeling approaches by focusing on two specific formalisms, Boolean networks and piecewise-linear differential equations, and illustrate their application by means of three well-known synthetic circuits. We describe various methods for the analysis of state transition graphs, discrete representations of the network dynamics that are generated in both modeling frameworks. We also briefly present the problem of controlling synthetic circuits, an emerging topic that could profit from the capacity of qualitative modeling approaches to rapidly scan a space of design alternatives.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationModels, GeneticBoolean modelsGene regulatory networksNetwork controlPiecewise-linear differential equation modelsQualitative modelingSynthetic circuits

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.