Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33405098›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology2021

Is COVID-19 Gender-sensitive?

Shreya Mukherjee, Kalipada Pahan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Age, gender and household infrastructural inequality in COVID-19: Contextual analysis of Mamelodi.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shreya MukherjeeDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1735 West Harrison St Suite Cohn 310, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Kalipada PahanDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1735 West Harrison St Suite Cohn 310, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. Kalipada_Pahan@rush.edu.

Funding

Muscle building supplement HMB for remyelinationR01AT010980 · NCCIH · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PAHAN, KALIPADA · 2020 to 2024
$2.7M
Characterizing novel hippocampal drugs for Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG050431 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PAHAN, KALIPADA · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Intranasal TIDM peptide for tauopathyR21AG069229 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PAHAN, KALIPADA · 2020 to 2021
$550k
TLR2-interacting domain of MyD88 peptide for alpha-synucleinopathyR21NS108025 · NINDS · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PAHAN, KALIPADA · 2018 to 2019
$393k
BLRD VA I01 BX003033BLRD VA I01 BX005002BLRD VA IK6 BX004982National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine AT010980NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT010980NIA NIH HHS AG050431NIA NIH HHS AG069229NIA NIH HHS R01 AG050431NIA NIH HHS R21 AG069229NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS108025Office of Academic Affiliations, Department of Veterans Affairs 1I01BX005002Office of Academic Affiliations, Department of Veterans Affairs 1IK6 BX004982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While clinical characteristics exhibit that susceptibility to COVID-19 infection is equally likely between males and females, clinical outcomes show that males experience both a higher severity and fatality for COVID-19 infection than females. This review examines the evidence for these sex and gender differences and aims to illustrate possible mechanisms behind such sensitivity. Successful entry of SARS-CoV-2 into the body is dependent on the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor and the transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2). Thus, sex-based differences in the expression of the ACE2 receptor and TMPRSS2 may explain the disparities in COVID-19 severity and fatality. Furthermore, these disparities may also be attributed to sex-based difference in immunological responses. Finally, the differences in clinical outcomes of COVID-19 infections between men and women may be due to gendered differences in behaviors, such as smoking, and prevalence to comorbidities. An understanding of the sex and gender sensitivities of COVID-19 infection is a necessary component towards the creation of effective treatment options and therapies for the virus. Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

COVID-19Disease SusceptibilityFemaleGender IdentityGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleSex CharacteristicsACE-2COVID-19GenderHypertensionTMPRSS2

Identifiers

PMID33405098
PMCPMC7786186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.