Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33405095›Full record

ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2021

Neural correlates of working memory's suppression of aversive olfactory distraction effects.

Alexander Weigard, Stephen J Wilson, Zvi Shapiro, Hilary Galloway-Long, Cynthia Huang-Pollock

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Functional Connectivity of the Chemosenses: A Review.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander WeigardDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Rachel Upjohn Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. asweigar@med.umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3820-6461
Stephen J WilsonDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, Moore Building, State College, PA, USA.
Zvi ShapiroDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, Moore Building, State College, PA, USA.
Hilary Galloway-LongDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, Moore Building, State College, PA, USA.
Cynthia Huang-PollockDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, Moore Building, State College, PA, USA.
Pennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Social Science Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University Level II grant, as well as in-kind scanner hours from the Social, Life, & Engineering Sciences Imaging Center (SLEIC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human cognitive performance is often disrupted by distractions related to aversive stimuli and affective states, but, paradoxically, there is also evidence to suggest that high working memory demands reduce the impact of aversive distraction. Previous empirical work suggests this latter effect occurs because working memory demands reduce attention to off-task processes, but the brain regions that mediate this effect remain uncertain. The current study utilizes a novel distraction manipulation involving unpleasant odorants to identify neural structures that buffer performance from aversive distraction under high working memory demands, and to clarify their connectivity in this context. Twenty-one healthy young adults (12 women) completed a verbal n-back task under two levels of load and were concurrently exposed to either room air or aversive odorants. Three brain regions displayed increases in neural responses to olfactory distractors under high load only; the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and right cerebellar Crus I. Of these regions, only the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex also displayed context-specific connectivity with a region thought to be involved in off-task processes: the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. Overall, results suggest that, under high working memory demands, areas of the prefrontal cortex and cerebellum shield cognition from aversive distraction, potentially through interactions with brain structures involved in off-task processes.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMemory, Short-TermBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansPrefrontal CortexYoung AdultCerebellumCognitive loadDistractorsDLPFCVLPFC

Identifiers

PMID33405095
OpenAlexW3118741784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.