ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2021
The use of gelling agents to preserve burnt teeth within the dental alveoli for dental human identification - a study utilising sheep mandibles.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forensic odontology in the search of dental evidence at the scene of events with incinerated victims: a scoping review.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Article
- A disaster victim identification workshop focused on forensic odontology using embalmed human remains.International journal of legal medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dental comparison is one of the primary methods of scientific identification of severely incinerated human remains. However, due to the fragile nature of the remains dental structures may be lost or damaged during recovery and transportation, limiting the amount of evidence available for examination. In addition to protecting the head, stabilization of the oral structures with an adhesive substance that will not interfere with the dental examination is ideal. A number of materials have been described in previous studies, however, no optimal method has yet to be indicated. Many of these materials contain petrochemicals, which have been shown to be a contamination risk. Wheatpaste solution has been demonstrated to be a viable alternative but has demonstrated handling issues and is not optimal in some environments. This study explores the stabilization of burnt teeth utilizing gelatin and agar solutions as alternatives to wheatpaste. Like wheatpaste solution, these materials are inexpensive, simple to use and are free from petrochemicals. Anterior sections of sheep mandibles were incinerated and subsequently solutions of agar, gelatin or wheatpaste were applied. The jaw fragments were then subjected to vibration and the number of teeth retained within the bone was recorded and compared to untreated incinerated jaw fragments. Although agar solution demonstrated serious handling issues, gelatin solution provided stabilization equivalent to that of wheatpaste. Gelatin also performed well at lower temperature conditions under which wheatpaste has been shown to perform poorly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33405072What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.