Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33404986›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2022

Socioeconomic Disparities in Gastric Cancer and Identification of a Single SES Variable for Predicting Risk.

Srawani Sarkar, Marc J Dauer, Haejin In

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Social determinants and equity across the gastric cancer continuum in Vietnam: a narrative review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection Among Asymptomatic Patients Served by a Safety-Net Healthcare System.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Srawani SarkarDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Marc J DauerDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Haejin InDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. hin@montefiore.org.

Funding

Collaborations and NCORP Collective ManagementUG1CA189823 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Evanthia Galanis, Olwen Hahn · 2014 to 2026
$120.6M
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation UG1CA189823NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSocioeconomic status (SES) is a known risk factor for gastric cancer (GC). This study seeks to examine education, income, and occupation variables separately to identify the single variable that can be best used to assess SES risk for GC.

methodsData from a case-control survey study were used. Logistic regression models were created for education, income, and occupation adjusted for age, sex, and race. Models were compared using AIC, c-statistics, and pseudo-R square to determine the model that had the highest risk predictive ability.

resultsGC cases had lower education levels and more commonly held jobs in unskilled labor. Annual household income was lower in cases compared to controls. Age, gender, race, education, and occupation were associated with increased risk of GC. The education model adjusted for age, gender, and race found < high school (HS) education to have an OR of 3.18 (95% CI 1.09-9.25) for GC compared to > HS education. The occupation model demonstrated that employment in unskilled labor had OR of 4.32 (95% CI 1.05-17.76) for GC compared to professional occupation. Model fit was best for the education model (AIC: 113.583, lower AIC is better) compared to income (117.562) or occupation (117.032). Education contributed the most to model variability (% delta pseudo-R square (4.7%)) compared to occupation (4.0%) or income (3.8%).

conclusionEducation level was the single most reliable measure of GC risk among 3 SES variables and can be employed as an ideal single indicator of SES-related GC risk when multiple SES factors cannot be obtained.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsHumansIncomeRisk FactorsSocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsBest SES variableGastric cancerRisk predictionSocioeconomic statusSurvey study

Identifiers

PMID33404986
PMCPMC8257773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.