ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2021
Validating the Lithuanian version of the STOP-BANG questionnaire for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subclinical Respiratory Muscle Weakness and Obstructive Sleep Apnea are Common in Glucosamine-UDP-N-acetyl-2-epimerase / N-acetylmannosamine kinase (GNE) Myopathy.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2026Article
- Translation and validation of the STOP-Bang questionnaire into Slovene.European journal of medical research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to prepare and validate the Lithuanian version of the STOP-BANG questionnaire and evaluate its correlation with polysomnography results.
methodsIn this study, we included patients ≥ 18 years of age who underwent overnight polysomnography between January 1 in 2018 and January 1 in 2019. All patients completed the STOP-BANG questionnaire before polysomnography. To assess the adequacy of the questionnaire, we used contingency tables and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
resultsThe study included 236 patients. The mean age of the patients was 55.2 ± 11.5 years and 159 (68%) were men. The mean apnea-hypopnea index for the entire study group was 33.8 ± 28.4, and the mean STOP-BANG score was 5.4 ± 1.6 points. Moderate (0.3-0.7, p < 0.05) correlations were found between the STOP-BANG questionnaire scores and all measured objective anthropometric and polysomnography parameters. The questionnaire's Cronbach's alpha score was 0.408. Based on the analysis of the ROC curves, the cut-off STOP-BANG score of 3 points showed a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 50% (AUC = 0.717) for the identification of any OSA. The positive predictive value (PPV) for an identification of any OSA at a cut-off point of 3 was 96%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 26%.
conclusionsThe linguistic and cultural adaptation of the Lithuanian version of the STOP-BANG questionnaire was carried out in accordance with international recommendations. The Lithuanian version of the STOP-BANG questionnaire is characterized by high sensitivity and average specificity in diagnosing OSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.