SynthesisCardiovascular drugs and therapy2022
Effects of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy - 2024.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Guideline
- The Effect of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- What are the best clinical management strategies for cardiomyopathy? an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Hypertensive Heart Disease: Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- A Narrative Review of Emerging Therapies for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.Current cardiology reviews · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAnimal studies have suggested that angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) can attenuate or reverse the progression of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, while clinical studies yielded conflicting results. We sought to conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the effect of ARBs in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
methodsPubMed and EMBASE databases were searched through June 2020. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, and each study's quality was assessed using the Jadad scale. The primary outcome was left ventricular mass reduction, and the secondary outcome was the change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Data were pooled using the random effects model.
resultsA total of 1294 articles were screened. Five RCTs were included in the final analysis, enrolling 209 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (101 patients were in the ARB arm). ARB treatment was not associated with either significant left ventricular mass reduction (standardized mean difference: - 0.25; 95% CI: - 0.73, 0.22; p = 0.29) or change in LVEF (weighted mean difference: 0.73%; 95% CI: - 1.10%, 2.56%; p = 0.43). Subgroup analysis showed that losartan, one of the most investigated and commonly used ARBs, was also not associated with significant decreases of left ventricular mass (standardized mean difference: - 0.13; 95% CI: - 0.61, 0.36; p = 0.61).
conclusionThis meta-analysis showed that ARB treatment is not associated with reduced left ventricular mass nor remarkable LVEF change among patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Further studies with a larger number of patients will be required to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33404924What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.