ArticleJournal of medical systems2021
Reviewing Machine Learning and Image Processing Based Decision-Making Systems for Breast Cancer Imaging.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Medical image processing and COVID-19: A literature review and bibliometric analysis.Journal of infection and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Stem Cells and Gene Therapy for Gynecological Cancers.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- An Interpretable Hybrid AI Model for Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Image Classification.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of convolutional neural networks and vision transformers in identifying benign and malignant breast lesions.Medicine · 2025Article
- Learning Architecture for Brain Tumor Classification Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network: Classic and ResNet50.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancements in Cancer Care by Exploring Multimodality Imaging Techniques and their Applications.Current medical imaging · 2025Review
- Hybrid ensemble deep learning model for advancing breast cancer detection and classification in clinical applications.Heliyon · 2024Article
- A comparative investigation of machine learning algorithms for predicting safety signs comprehension based on socio-demographic factors and cognitive sign features.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Deep Active Learning for Automatic Mitotic Cell Detection on HEp-2 Specimen Medical Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Classification of Breast Lesions on DCE-MRI Data Using a Fine-Tuned MobileNet.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Microglial morphometric analysis: so many options, so little consistency.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Breast Imaging: A Scientometric Umbrella Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A Deep Learning Computer-Aided Diagnosis Approach for Breast Cancer.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Complex Radiomic Signature in Luminal Breast Cancer from a Weighted Statistical Framework: A Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- In Silico Modeling Demonstrates that User Variability During Tumor Measurement Can Affect In Vivo Therapeutic Efficacy Outcomes.Cancer informatics · 2022Article
- State-of-the-Art Challenges and Perspectives in Multi-Organ Cancer Diagnosis via Deep Learning-Based Methods.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of death among women worldwide. It affects in general women older than 40 years old. Medical images analysis is one of the most promising research areas since it provides facilities for diagnosis and decision-making of several diseases such as BC. This paper conducts a Structured Literature Review (SLR) of the use of Machine Learning (ML) and Image Processing (IP) techniques to deal with BC imaging. A set of 530 papers published between 2000 and August 2019 were selected and analyzed according to ten criteria: year and publication channel, empirical type, research type, medical task, machine learning techniques, datasets used, validation methods, performance measures and image processing techniques which include image pre-processing, segmentation, feature extraction and feature selection. Results showed that diagnosis was the most used medical task and that Deep Learning techniques (DL) were largely used to perform classification. Furthermore, we found out that classification was the most ML objective investigated followed by prediction and clustering. Most of the selected studies used Mammograms as imaging modalities rather than Ultrasound or Magnetic Resonance Imaging with the use of public or private datasets with MIAS as the most frequently investigated public dataset. As for image processing techniques, the majority of the selected studies pre-process their input images by reducing the noise and normalizing the colors, and some of them use segmentation to extract the region of interest with the thresholding method. For feature extraction, we note that researchers extracted the relevant features using classical feature extraction techniques (e.g. Texture features, Shape features, etc.) or DL techniques (e. g. VGG16, VGG19, ResNet, etc.), and finally few papers used feature selection techniques in particular the filter methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33404910What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.