Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33404833›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Gut microbiome analysis as a predictive marker for the gastric cancer patients.

Yangyang Zhang, Jian Shen, Xinwei Shi, Yaoqiang Du, Yaofang Niu, Gulei Jin, Zhen Wang, Jianxin Lyu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The influence ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yangyang ZhangBengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Jian ShenResearch Center of Blood Transfusion Medicine, Education Ministry Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xinwei ShiThe Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yaoqiang DuResearch Center of Blood Transfusion Medicine, Education Ministry Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yaofang NiuHangzhou Guhe Information and Technology Company, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Gulei JinHangzhou Guhe Information and Technology Company, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhen WangResearch Center of Blood Transfusion Medicine, Education Ministry Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. wangzhen@hmc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7307-7485
Jianxin LyuBengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China. jxlu313@163.com.
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CNBengbu Medical College · CNZhejiang Science and Technology Information Institute · CNWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

Key and Major Projects of Traditional Chinese Medicine Scientific Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province in China 2019ZZ001Key projects jointly constructed by the Ministry and the province of Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Project in China WKJ-ZJ-2019Medicine and Health Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province in China 2017KY216Medicine and Health Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province in China 2017KY486Medicine and Health Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province in China 2019KY017Medicine and Health Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province in China 2019RC012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota have been implicated in the development of cancer. Colorectal and gastric cancers, the major gastrointestinal tract cancers, are closely connected with the gut microbiome. Nevertheless, the characteristics of gut microbiota composition that correlate with gastric cancer are unclear. In this study, we investigated gut microbiota alterations during the progression of gastric cancer to identify the most relevant taxa associated with gastric cancer and evaluated the potential of the microbiome as an indicator for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Compared with the healthy group, gut microbiota composition and diversity shifted in patients with gastric cancer. Different bacteria were used to design a random forest model, which provided an area under the curve value of 0.91. Verification samples achieved a true positive rate of 0.83 in gastric cancer. Principal component analysis showed that gastritis shares some microbiome characteristics of gastric cancer. Chemotherapy reduced the elevated bacteria levels in gastric cancer by more than half. More importantly, we found that the genera Lactobacillus and Megasphaera were associated with gastric cancer.Key Points• Gut microbiota has high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing patients with gastric cancer from healthy individuals, indicating that gut microbiota is a potential noninvasive tool for the diagnosis of gastric cancer.• Gastritis shares some microbiota features with gastric cancer, and chemotherapy reduces the microbial abundance and diversity in gastric cancer patients.• Two bacterial taxa, namely, Lactobacillus and Megasphaera, are predictive markers for gastric cancer.

Indexed as

GastritisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaStomach NeoplasmsFecesHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16 S ribosomal RNAGastric cancerGut microbiotaPredictive marker

Identifiers

PMID33404833
OpenAlexW3119958727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.