Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33404832›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Changes in planktonic and sediment bacterial communities under the highly regulated dam in the mid-part of the Three Gorges Reservoir.

Yu Qin, Qiong Tang, Lunhui Lu, Yuchun Wang, Irina Izaguirre, Zhe Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yu QinKey Laboratory of Hydraulic and Waterway Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, 400074, China.
Qiong TangKey Laboratory of Hydraulic and Waterway Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, 400074, China.
Lunhui LuKey Laboratory of Reservoir Aquatic Environment, Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, 400714, China. lulunhui@cigit.ac.cn.
Yuchun WangState Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, Beijing, 10038, China.
Irina IzaguirreDepartamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución-IEGEBA (UBA-CONICET), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Zhe LiKey Laboratory of Reservoir Aquatic Environment, Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, 400714, China.

Funding

Chongqing Bureau of Science and Technology cstc2020jcyj-jqX0010Chongqing Bureau of Science and Technology cstc2020jscx-msxmX0121National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) 2017YFC0404705National Natural Science Foundation of China 51861125204National Natural Science Foundation of China 91647208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial communities play an important role in the biogeochemical cycle in reservoir ecosystems. However, the dynamic changes in both planktonic and sediment bacterial communities in a highly regulated dam reservoir remain unclear. This study investigated the temporal distribution patterns of bacterial communities in a transition section of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) using Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Results suggested that in comparison to the planktonic bacteria, sediment bacteria contributed more to the reservoir microbial communities, accounting for 97% of the 7434 OTUs. The Shannon diversity index in the water (3.22~5.68) was generally lower than that in the sediment (6.72~7.56). In the high water level period (January and March), Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, and Firmicutes were the most abundant phyla, whereas in the low water level period (May, July, and September), the dominant phyla were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. Sediment samples were dominated by Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Acidobacteria. Principal coordinate analysis of the bacterioplankton communities showed greater sensitivity to monthly changes than that of the sediment bacterial communities. Network analysis suggested that in comparison to planktonic bacterial communities, sediment bacterial communities were more complex and stable. The linear relationship between the CH

Indexed as

CyanobacteriaPlanktonBacteroidetesChinaGeologic SedimentsProteobacteriaBacterial communitiesCommunity structureSedimentThree Gorges ReservoirWater

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.