Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33404813›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Coping during COVID-19: a mixed methods study of older cancer survivors.

Jacqueline Galica, Ziwei Liu, Danielle Kain, Shaila Merchant, Christopher Booth, Rachel Koven, Michael Brundage, Kristen R Haase

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Patient Voices: What Can We Learn From the Covid-19 Pandemic About Follow-Up Care in Gynaecologic Oncology?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Experiences of cancer care in COVID-19: A longitudinal qualitative study.European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jacqueline GalicaSchool of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada. jacqueline.galica@queensu.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3072-2472
Ziwei LiuSchool of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4981-4323
Danielle KainDivision of Palliative Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Oncology, School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3987-0962
Shaila MerchantDivision of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8133-7988
Christopher BoothDivision of Cancer Care & Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1505-0575
Rachel KovenDivision of Cancer Care & Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Canada.
Michael BrundageDivision of Cancer Care & Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5104-0497
Kristen R HaaseSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Science, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4457-2110

Funding

Queen's University SARS CoV-2/COVID-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOlder cancer survivors are among the most vulnerable to the negative effects of COVID-19 and may need specific survivorship supports that are unavailable/restricted during the pandemic. The objective of this study was to explore how older adults (≥ 60 years) who were recently (≤ 12 months) discharged from the care of their cancer team were coping during the pandemic.

methodsWe used a convergent mixed method design (QUAL+quan). Quantitative data were collected using the Brief-COPE questionnaire. Qualitative data were collected using telephone interviews to explore experiences and strategies for coping with cancer-related concerns.

resultsThe mean sample age (n = 30) was 72.1 years (SD 5.8, range 63-83) of whom 57% identified as female. Participants' Brief-COPE responses indicated that they commonly used acceptance (n = 29, 96.7%), self-distraction (n = 28, 93.3%), and taking action (n = 28, 93.3%) coping strategies. Through our descriptive thematic analysis, we identified three themes: (1) drawing on lived experiences, (2) redeploying coping strategies, and (3) complications of cancer survivorship in a pandemic. Participants' coping strategies were rooted in experiences with cancer, other illnesses, life, and work. Using these strategies during the pandemic was not new-they were redeployed and repurposed-although using them during the pandemic was sometimes complicated. These data were converged to maximize interpretation of the findings.

conclusionsStudy findings may inform the development or enhancement of cancer and non-cancer resources to support coping, particularly using remote delivery methods within and beyond the pandemic. Clinicians can engage a strengths-based approach to support older cancer survivors as they draw from their experiences, which contain a repository of potential coping skills.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCancer SurvivorsCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCancerCoping behaviorsCoping skillsMixed methodsOlder adultsQualitative

Identifiers

PMID33404813
PMCPMC7786158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.