Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33404801›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2021

Exploring literature on knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices towards urinary incontinence management: a scoping review.

Anika Janse van Vuuren, J A van Rensburg, Lonese Jacobs, Susan Hanekom

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anika Janse van VuurenStellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa. ajvanv45@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2741-935X
J A van RensburgDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Urogynaecology Unit, Tygerberg Hospital, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Lonese JacobsDepartment of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Susan HanekomDepartment of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisUrinary incontinence affects women of all ages, influencing 8.5% of the world's population in 2018. Effective management of urinary incontinence is influenced by patients help-seeking behaviour and services offered by healthcare professionals within the healthcare system. To facilitate behavioural change, it is important to understand the knowledge(Knowledge: "the comprehension and understanding of acquired facts or information about UI in adults"), attitudes (Attitude: "a predisposed perspective which influences nurses' thoughts, feelings, perceptions and behaviours towards care of adults with UI") and beliefs (Beliefs: "a theoretically conceptualized conviction or expectation regarding UI in general") of healthcare practitioners towards urinary incontinence management. The aim of this review is thus to systematically map the existing literature, reporting on how knowledge, attitude, belief and practices towards urinary incontinence management have been explored.

methodsSix databases were systematically searched. Included studies were published between January 2013 to January 2020 in English, investigating urinary incontinence management in women.

resultsThe search yielded 39 studies, with data emanating from 16 counties. Quantitative, Qualitative and mixed methodologies were used to explore the four concepts of knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices. A wide range of healthcare practitioners were questioned and management was explored in five healthcare settings. All factors explored related to the four concepts are reported and factors reaching consensus in included literature were highlighted.

conclusionThe summarized factors can assist further investigations into the four concepts to change healthcare practitioner's behaviour towards urinary incontinence management.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeUrinary IncontinenceAdultFemaleHumansAttitudeBeliefKnowledgePracticeUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID33404801
OpenAlexW3118988853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.