Trial reportClinical oral investigations2021
Clinical, radiographic, and histological evaluation of three different pulp-capping materials in indirect pulp treatment of primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the cytotoxicity and efficacy of nanoemulsion containing propolis plus Nigella sativa nanoparticles for pulpotomy of primary teeth: randomised split-mouth clinical trial pilot study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025Trial
- Resin-Modified Calcium Silicate-Based Materials Versus Conventional Formulations in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Vital Pulp Therapy Procedures in Pediatric Dentistry.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Macrophage-Marker Response and Exploratory Hepatorenal Safety of a Tricalcium Silicate-Biogenic Calcium Carbonate (International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Effect of light-cured pulp capping materials on human dental pulp cells in vitro.International endodontic journal · 2025Article
- Review
- An Evaluation of Turkish Dentists' Approach to Indirect Pulp Capping and Material Preferences: A Questionnaire-Based Survey.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Effect of TheraCal PT and Biodentine on inflammatory cell infiltration and hard tissue formation after pulpotomy in inflamed or healthy rat molars.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Clinical and radiographic success of TheraCal versus Formocresol in primary teeth pulpotomy: A systematic review andThe Saudi dental journal · 2024Review
- Comparative Clinical and Radiographic Success Rate of Bioceramic Premix vs Biosilicate-based Medicament as Indirect Pulp Treatment Materials in Primary Molars: A Double-blind Randomized Trial with a Follow-up of 12 Months.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024Article
- Bioactive Biosilicate Cements in Pediatric Dentistry - A Review of the Latest Materials.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Review
- Outcomes and predictive factors of vital pulp therapy in a large-scale retrospective cohort study over 10 years.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride in indirect pulp capping in primary molars: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Pulp Therapy of Primary Dentition; its Relevance despite Insufficient Histological Evidence: A Review.Iranian endodontic journal · 2023Review
- Micro-shear bond strength of different calcium silicate materials to bulk-fill composite.PeerJ · 2023Article
- Evaluation of cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity of different pulp capping liners.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2023Article
- Clinical Efficacy of Biomimetic Bioactive Biomaterials for Dental Pulp Capping: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- In-vitro models of biocompatibility testing for restorative dental materials: From 2D cultures to organs on-a-chip.Acta biomaterialia · 2022Review
- Antibiofilm potential over time of a tricalcium silicate material and its association with sodium diclofenac.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Article
- Vital Pulp Therapy in Primary Dentition: Pulpotomy-A 100-Year Challenge.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this randomized, controlled, three-arm parallel group, and double-blinded clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and histopathological success of three different pulp-capping materials in one-stage indirect pulp treatment of primary teeth. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study included a total of 109 patients aged 5-9 years who had primary teeth with deep carious lesions and symptoms of reversible pulpitis. The teeth were divided into three groups according to the pulp-capping agents: (I) hard-setting calcium hydroxide (Dycal) (control group) (n = 36), (II) bioactive tricalcium silicate (Biodentine) (n = 37), and (III) resin-based tricalcium silicate (TheraCal LC) (n = 36). All the teeth were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. A total of 23 primary mandibular second molars that were in their regular exfoliation period (24-40 months) were extracted and fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution. The specimens were evaluated histologically to assess the integrity of the odontoblastic layer, tertiary dentin formation quality of the dentin formed, severity of pulpitis, and other pulpal changes. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, Pearson's chi-square test, and McNemar's test (p = 0.05).
resultsAt the end of the 24-month follow-up period, the clinical and radiographic success rates for Dycal, Biodentine, and TheraCal LC were 100%, 100%, and 93.3%, respectively, and there was no significant difference among the groups (p > 0.05). However, the TheraCal LC group was statistically unsuccessful when compared to the other groups with regard to the integrity of the odontoblastic layer, severity of pulpitis, and other pulpal changes in histological examination (p < 0.05).
conclusionIndirect pulp capping exhibited high clinical and radiographic success rates in the treatment of primary teeth regardless of the chosen pulp-capping agent. However, histological examination indicated that the pulp status was affected by the chosen capping material especially when selecting a resin-containing material such as TheraCal LC. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Resin-free calcium silicate-based materials appear to be more favorable in the indirect pulp treatment of primary teeth, particularly in young-age groups that require long-term success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33404764What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.