Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33404696›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Radiomic analysis of HTR-DCE MR sequences improves diagnostic performance compared to BI-RADS analysis of breast MR lesions.

Saskia Vande Perre, Loïc Duron, Audrey Milon, Asma Bekhouche, Daniel Balvay, Francois H Cornelis, Laure Fournier, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment: Imaging Assessment.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saskia Vande PerreTenon Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France.
Loïc DuronPARCC, INSERM, Université de Paris, F-75015, Paris, France.
Audrey MilonTenon Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France.
Asma BekhoucheTenon Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France.
Daniel BalvayPARCC, INSERM, Université de Paris, F-75015, Paris, France.
Francois H CornelisTenon Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France.
Laure FournierPARCC, INSERM, Université de Paris, F-75015, Paris, France.
Isabelle Thomassin-NaggaraTenon Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France. isabelle.thomassin@tnn.aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0919-0133
Inserm · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the diagnostic performance of radiomic analysis using high temporal resolution (HTR)-dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) MR sequences compared to BI-RADS analysis to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from consecutive women who underwent breast MRI including HTR-DCE MR sequencing for abnormal enhancing lesions and who had subsequent pathological analysis at our tertiary center. Semi-quantitative enhancement parameters and textural features were extracted. Temporal change across each phase of textural features in HTR-DCE MR sequences was calculated and called "kinetic textural parameters." Statistical analysis by LASSO logistic regression and cross validation was performed to build a model. The diagnostic performance of the radiomic model was compared to the results of BI-RADS MR score analysis.

resultsWe included 117 women with a mean age of 54 years (28-88). Of the 174 lesions analyzed, 75 were benign and 99 malignant. Seven semi-quantitative enhancement parameters and 57 textural features were extracted. Regression analysis selected 15 significant variables in a radiomic model (called "malignant probability score") which displayed an AUC = 0.876 (sensitivity = 0.98, specificity = 0.52, accuracy = 0.78). The performance of the malignant probability score to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions (AUC = 0.876, 95%CI 0.825-0.925) was significantly better than that of BI-RADS analysis (AUC = 0.831, 95%CI 0.769-0.892). The radiomic model significantly reduced false positives (42%) with the same number of missed cancers (n = 2).

conclusionA radiomic model including kinetic textural features extracted from an HTR-DCE MR sequence improves diagnostic performance over BI-RADS analysis. KEY POINTS: • Radiomic analysis using HTR-DCE is of better diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.876) than conventional breast MRI reading with BI-RADS (AUC = 0.831) (p < 0.001). • A radiomic malignant probability score under 19.5% gives a negative predictive value of 100% while a malignant probability score over 81% gives a positive predictive value of 100%. • Kinetic textural features extracted from HTR-DCE-MRI have a major role to play in distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsContrast MediaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreastFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaArtificial intelligenceBreastMRI image enhancementNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33404696
OpenAlexW3119536268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.