Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33404506›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Digital Health Needs of Women With Postpartum Depression: Focus Group Study.

Madison E Lackie, Julia S Parrilla, Brynn M Lavery, Andrea L Kennedy, Deirdre Ryan, Barbara Shulman, Lori A Brotto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Madison E LackieWomen's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital + Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5312-9014
Julia S ParrillaSchool of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7493-1367
Brynn M LaveryDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3722-1088
Andrea L KennedyReproductive Mental Health Program, BC Women's Hospital + Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7022-9463
Deirdre RyanReproductive Mental Health Program, BC Women's Hospital + Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3640-6566
Barbara ShulmanReproductive Mental Health Program, BC Women's Hospital + Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2201-0651
Lori A BrottoWomen's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital + Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7552-8588

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough approximately 10% of new mothers in Canada develop postpartum depression (PPD), they face many barriers when accessing care. eHealth offers a unique opportunity to provide psychosocial skills and support to new mothers; however, patient populations are not consistently engaged in eHealth development processes. Thus, the diversity of women's backgrounds and needs are often not reflected in existing tools.

objectiveThis study aims to engage women from a variety of backgrounds and locations around British Columbia (BC) who have previously experienced PPD to determine the unmet psychoeducational needs of women with PPD and how a web-enabled platform used to deliver psychosocial skills and education to assist in the management of PPD could fulfill those needs.

methodsFocus groups were conducted in 7 cities across BC with a total of 31 women (mean age 34.5 years, SD 4.9), with each group ranging from 2-7 participants. Focus groups were cofacilitated by the study coordinator and a local service provider in each community using a semistructured guide to discuss participants' needs, ideas, and opinions as they relate to the use of technology in PPD management. Transcripts were approached inductively using thematic analysis to identify themes and qualitative description to frame what was observed in the data.

resultsA total of 5 themes were identified: bridging gaps to meet needs; providing validation to combat stigma; nurturing capacity to cope, manage, and/or reach wellness; empowering people to take ownership over their mental health; and offering customization to ensure relevance. Each theme identified a need (eg, combatting stigma) and a way to address that need using a web-enabled intervention (eg, providing validation). At the intersection of these themes was the overarching value of promoting agency for women experiencing PPD.

conclusionsUltimately, new mothers require accessible mental health care that promotes their agency in mental health care decision making. Our participants believed that a web-enabled intervention could help meet this need. These data will be used to guide the design of such an intervention, with the eventual implementation of this resource as a first-line management option for PPD.

Indexed as

AdultDepression, PostpartumFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMental Health ServicesTelemedicineeHealthfocus groupsknowledge translationmaternal healthperinatal mental healthpostpartum depressionqualitative researchreproductive healthself-managementuser-centered designwomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID33404506
PMCPMC7817361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.