Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33403827›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2021

Initial findings in traumatic peripheral nerve injury and repair with diffusion tensor imaging.

Michael D Pridmore, Gabriella E Glassman, Alonda C Pollins, Isaac V Manzanera Esteve, Brian C Drolet, Douglas R Weikert, Mark D Does, Galen Perdikis, Wesley P Thayer, Richard D Dortch

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Magnetic resonance tractography of the brachial plexus: step-by-step.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael D PridmoreVanderbilt Institute for Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9879-7147
Gabriella E GlassmanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Alonda C PollinsDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Isaac V Manzanera EsteveDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9282-7026
Brian C DroletDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Douglas R WeikertDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Mark D DoesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Galen PerdikisDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Wesley P ThayerDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Richard D DortchVanderbilt Institute for Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USBarrow Neurological Institute · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Biomedical MRI and MRST32EB001628 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI John C Gore · 2003 to 2026
$7.0M
Quantitative Assessment of Peripheral Nerve Injury and Repair via Multi-Parametric MRIR01NS097821 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DORTCH, RICHARD · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
MRI Biomarkers of Disease Progression in Inherited NeuropathiesR21TR003312 · NCATS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DORTCH, RICHARD, LI, JUN · 2021 to 2022
$440k
National Institute of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disease and Stroke R01 NS097821 (RDD)NCATS NIH HHS R21 TR003312NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001628NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097821U.S. Department of Defense MR150075 (WPT)U.S. Department of Defense W81XWH-15-JPC-8/CRMRP-NMSIRA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveManagement of peripheral nerve injuries requires physicians to rely on qualitative measures from patient history, electromyography, and physical exam. Determining a successful nerve repair can take months to years for proximal injuries, and the resulting delays in clinical decision-making can lead to a negative impact on patient outcomes. Early identification of a failed nerve repair could prevent permanent muscle atrophy and loss of function. This study aims to test the feasibility of performing diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to evaluate injury and recovery following repair of wrist trauma. We hypothesize that DTI provides a noninvasive and reliable assessment of regeneration, which may improve clinical decision-making and alter the clinical course of surgical interventions.

methodsClinical and MRI measurements from subjects with traumatic peripheral nerve injury, carpal tunnel syndrome, and healthy control subjects were compared to evaluate the relationship between DTI metrics and injury severity.

resultsFractional anisotropy from DTI was sensitive to differences between damaged and healthy nerves, damaged and compressed nerves, and injured and healthy contralateral nerves. Longitudinal measurements in two injury subjects also related to clinical outcomes. Implications of other diffusion measures are also discussed.

interpretationDTI is a sensitive tool for wrist nerve injuries and can be utilized for monitoring nerve recovery. Across three subjects with nerve injuries, this study has shown how DTI can detect abnormalities between injured and healthy nerves, measure recovery, and determine if re-operation was successful. Additional comparisons to carpal tunnel syndrome and healthy nerves show that DTI is sensitive to the degree of impairment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnisotropyCarpal Tunnel SyndromeCohort StudiesDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve RegenerationPeripheral Nerve InjuriesRecovery of Function

Identifiers

PMID33403827
PMCPMC7886047
OpenAlexW3119394407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.