Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33403772›Full record

ArticleJournal of internal medicine2021

Prevalence and 6-month recovery of olfactory dysfunction: a multicentre study of 1363 COVID-19 patients.

J R Lechien, C M Chiesa-Estomba, E Beckers, V Mustin, M Ducarme, F Journe, A Marchant, L Jouffe, M R Barillari, G Cammaroto and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 121 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05216614 phase2withdrawnnot on this map

Fluvoxamine to Augment Olfactory Recovery For Long COVID-19 Parosmia (FluCOP Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2021 to 2022Enrolled0ConditionsCOVID-19, Olfactory Disorder, ParosmiaArmsFluvoxamine, Placebo
NCT06498687 phase1withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of CYR-064 Theophylline Nasal Spray for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease Related Hyposmia and Anosmia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NebraskaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsHyposmia, AnosmiaArmsCYR-064
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Long COVID, audiovestibular symptoms and persistent chemosensory dysfunction: a systematic review of the current evidence.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Cognitive assessment of patients with post-COVID olfactory dysfunction and impaired domains.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Unique and shared patterns of chemosensory dysfunction distinguish chronic COVID-19 and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Combination antiviral and anti-inflammatory therapy mitigates persistent neurological deficits in mice post SARS-CoV-2 infection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

J R LechienFrom the, COVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0845-0845
C M Chiesa-EstombaFrom the, COVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Marseille, France.
E BeckersDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Clinique de l'Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
V MustinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Clinique de l'Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
M DucarmeDepartment of Surgery, EpiCURA Hospital, Hornu, Belgium.
F JourneDepartment of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium.
A MarchantInstitute for Medical Immunology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
L JouffeBayesia, Changé, France.
M R BarillariFrom the, COVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Marseille, France.
G CammarotoFrom the, COVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Marseille, France.
M P CirciuFrom the, COVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Marseille, France.
S HansFrom the, COVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Marseille, France.
S SaussezFrom the, COVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Marseille, France.

Funding

FRMH 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate prevalence and recovery of olfactory dysfunction (OD) in COVID-19 patients according to the disease severity.

methodsFrom 22 March to 3 June 2020, 2581 COVID-19 patients were identified from 18 European hospitals. Epidemiological and clinical data were extracted at baseline and within the 2-month post-infection.

resultsThe prevalence of OD was significantly higher in mild form (85.9%) compared with moderate-to-critical forms (4.5-6.9%; P = 0.001). Of the 1916 patients with OD, 1363 completed the evaluations (71.1%). A total of 328 patients (24.1%) did not subjectively recover olfaction 60 days after the onset of the dysfunction. The mean duration of self-reported OD was 21.6 ± 17.9 days. Objective olfactory evaluations identified hyposmia/anosmia in 54.7% and 36.6% of mild and moderate-to-critical forms, respectively (P = 0.001). At 60 days and 6 months, 15.3% and 4.7% of anosmic/hyposmic patients did not objectively recover olfaction, respectively. The higher baseline severity of objective olfactory evaluations was strongly predictive of persistent OD (P < 0.001).

conclusionOD is more prevalent in mild COVID-19 forms than in moderate-to-critical forms. OD disappeared in 95% of patients regarding objective olfactory evaluations at 6 months.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCOVID-19EuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOlfaction DisordersPrevalenceRecovery of FunctionSeverity of Illness IndexanosmiaCOVID-19olfactoryrecoverySARS-CoV-2smell

Identifiers

PMID33403772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.