Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33403646›Full record

ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2021

Gastro-retentive drug delivery systems: a recent update on clinical pertinence and drug delivery.

Supratim Das, Sukhbir Kaur, Vineet Kumar Rai

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Supratim DasDepartment of Pharmaceutics, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, Punjab, 142001, India.
Sukhbir KaurDepartment of Pharmaceutics, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, Punjab, 142001, India.
Vineet Kumar RaiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, Punjab, 142001, India. raivk.gkp@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8726-3959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastro-retentive drug delivery systems are some of the best technologies delivered through oral route. These mainly came into picture for their effective local action in the GI region, specifically for the drugs with narrow absorption window. In the recent decades, several technologies have evolved showing different mechanisms for retaining the drug in GI region for longer duration with increased bioavailability. Floatable, mucoadhesive, swelable, magnetic, nanofibrous, high-density, and expandable systems have been investigated extensively as the potential gastro-retentive strategies. The advances in the technologies studied, their clinical pertinence, and methods of drug delivery are described in this review with their immense future utilities. Their entry into the pharmaceutical market is a huge matter to look into as most of the studied strategies are facing problems and hence are underrated to overcome the clinical trials. Their success in the clinical trials are enormously required for gaining their access into the pharmaceutical market. Selection of the right technology for the right purpose through the right mechanism of action is to be done for obtaining the system with desired activity.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsNanofibersAdministration, OralBiological AvailabilityDelayed-Action PreparationsPharmaceutical PreparationsDelayed-Action PreparationsPharmaceutical PreparationsFloatingGastro-retentiveHigh densityMucoadhesiveStomach-specific

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.