Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33403642›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Biotechnology and nanotechnology for remediation of chlorinated volatile organic compounds: current perspectives.

Parisa Ebrahimbabaie, John Pichtel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Analysis of the Degradation of OCPs Contaminated Soil by the BC/nZVI Combined with Indigenous Microorganisms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Plant contribution to the remediation of PAH-contaminated soil of Dagang Oilfield by Fire Phoenix.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Parisa EbrahimbabaieDepartment of Environment, Geology, and Natural Resources, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, 47306, USA.
John PichtelDepartment of Environment, Geology, and Natural Resources, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, 47306, USA. jpichtel@bsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs) are persistent organic pollutants which are harmful to public health and the environment. Many CVOCs occur in substantial quantities in groundwater and soil, even though their use has been more carefully managed and restricted in recent years. This review summarizes recent data on several innovative treatment solutions for CVOC-affected media including bioremediation, phytoremediation, nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI)-based reductive dehalogenation, and photooxidation. There is no optimally developed single technology; therefore, the possibility of using combined technologies for CVOC remediation, for example bioremediation integrated with reduction by nZVI, is presented. Some methods are still in the development stage. Advantages and disadvantages of each treatment strategy are provided. It is hoped that this paper can provide a basic framework for selection of successful CVOC remediation strategies.

Indexed as

Environmental Restoration and RemediationGroundwaterVolatile Organic CompoundsWater Pollutants, ChemicalBiotechnologyNanotechnologyVolatile Organic CompoundsWater Pollutants, ChemicalBioremediationCVOCsNanoparticlesPhotooxidationPhytoremediationZero-valent iron

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.